首页> 外文学位 >A review of issues involving non-inferiority trials: A review of study design features, sample size, and analytic issues.
【24h】

A review of issues involving non-inferiority trials: A review of study design features, sample size, and analytic issues.

机译:对涉及非自卑性试验的问题的审查:对研究设计特征,样本量和分析问题的审查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Randomized, non-inferiority (abbreviated hereafter as NI) trials directly compare the new experimental therapy to an existing effective treatment without a placebo or with no treatment arm. With advancement in medicine, non-inferiority trials with active control are being utilized more often when the classic placebo-controlled superiority trial is considered unethical due to existing effective therapy and to test the efficacy of the alternative treatment. Non-inferiority trials aim to demonstrate that the new test treatment is not inferior to the standard therapy. Oftentimes the new therapy claims to have some advantages over standard treatment such as less toxicity, simpler regimen or lower cost. For example, voriconazole may provide better adverse event profile than does amphotericin B deoxycholate in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Also, for community acquired pneumonia, a new quinolone is more convenient to administer than penicillin.;If the non-inferiority is established, then the new treatment will be accepted as a valid alternative with better benefit to risk ratio. Due to complexities inherent to non-inferiority trials, there are many challenges associated with this design. This paper will review and discuss important design features (i.e. choosing an appropriate NI margin, assessing 'assay sensitivity' and 'constancy assumption' that we define later), sample size estimation and analytic issues around non-inferiority trials (i.e. intent to treat versus per protocol and fixed margin versus synthesis approach to determine non-inferiority). Non-inferiority trials can be anticonservative in nature. This means that non-inferiority trials are more likely to yield desired results than superiority trials thereby more vulnerable to biases. Hence the assumptions underlying the NI design must be made explicitly and the resultant conclusion should be reviewed rigorously for the new test treatment to be clinically accepted and marketed to the general public.
机译:随机,非自卑性(以下简称NI)试验将新的实验疗法与没有安慰剂或没有治疗组的现有有效疗法进行了直接比较。随着医学的进步,当由于现有有效的治疗方法而将传统的安慰剂对照的优势试验视为不道德时,经常采用具有主动控制的非劣效性试验,以测试替代疗法的有效性。非劣效性试验旨在证明新的测试疗法不逊于标准疗法。通常,新疗法声称比标准疗法具有一些优势,例如毒性小,方案简单或成本较低。例如,伏立康唑在侵袭性曲霉病的治疗中可能比两性霉素B脱氧胆酸盐提供更好的不良事件。此外,对于社区获得性肺炎,新的喹诺酮类药物比青霉素更易于管理。如果确立了非劣效性,那么新的治疗方法将被认为是有效的替代方法,具有更好的风险比。由于非劣效性试验固有的复杂性,该设计存在许多挑战。本文将回顾和讨论重要的设计特征(即选择适当的NI裕度,评估我们稍后定义的“测定灵敏度”和“恒定假设”),样本量估计和有关非劣效性试验的分析问题(即治疗意图与每个协议,以及固定边距与综合方法来确定非劣势性)。非劣效性试验本质上可以是抗保守的。这意味着非劣效性试验比优越性试验更有可能产生预期的结果,因此更容易产生偏见。因此,必须明确做出NI设计的基础假设,并严格审查得出的结论,以使新的测试治疗方法能够在临床上被接受并推向公众。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yang, YoonJung.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Public Health.
  • 学位 M.P.H.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 47 p.
  • 总页数 47
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号