首页> 外文学位 >Technosciences in Academia: Rethinking a Conceptual Framework for Bioinformatics Undergraduate Curricula.
【24h】

Technosciences in Academia: Rethinking a Conceptual Framework for Bioinformatics Undergraduate Curricula.

机译:学术界的技术科学:对生物信息学本科课程概念框架的重新思考。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper aims to elucidate guiding concepts for the design of powerful undergraduate bioinformatics degrees which will lead to a conceptual framework for the curriculum. "Powerful" here should be understood as having truly bioinformatics objectives rather than enrichment of existing computer science or life science degrees on which bioinformatics degrees are often based. As such, the conceptual framework will be one which aims to demonstrate intellectual honesty in regards to the field of bioinformatics. A synthesis/conceptual analysis approach was followed as elaborated by Hurd (1983). The approach takes into account the following: bioinfonnatics educational needs and goals as expressed by different authorities, five undergraduate bioinformatics degrees case-studies, educational implications of bioinformatics as a technoscience and approaches to curriculum design promoting interdisciplinarity and integration. Given these considerations, guiding concepts emerged and a conceptual framework was elaborated. The practice of bioinformatics was given a closer look, which led to defining tool-integration skills and tool-thinking capacity as crucial areas of the bioinformatics activities spectrum. It was argued, finally, that a process-based curriculum as a variation of a concept-based curriculum (where the concepts are processes) might be more conducive to the teaching of bioinformatics given a foundational first year of integrated science education as envisioned by Bialek and Botstein (2004). Furthermore, the curriculum design needs to define new avenues of communication and learning which bypass the traditional disciplinary barriers of academic settings as undertaken by Tador and Tidmor (2005) for graduate studies.
机译:本文旨在阐明指导性概念,以设计功能强大的本科生生物信息学学位,从而为课程设置概念框架。这里“强大”应该理解为具有真正的生物信息学目标,而不是丰富生物信息学学位通常基于的现有计算机科学或生命科学学位。因此,概念框架将是一个旨在证明有关生物信息学领域的知识诚实的框架。赫德(1983)阐述了一种综合/概念分析方法。该方法考虑了以下内容:不同主管部门表达的生物信息学教育需求和目标,五个本科生生物信息学学位案例研究,生物信息学作为技术科学的教育意义以及促进跨学科和一体化的课程设计方法。考虑到这些考虑因素,出现了指导概念并拟定了概念框架。对生物信息学的实践进行了仔细研究,从而将工具集成技能和工具思维能力定义为生物信息学活动范围的关键领域。最后,有人争论说,鉴于Bialek设想的综合科学教育的基础一年级,基于过程的课程是基于概念的课程(其中概念是过程)的变体,可能更有利于生物信息学的教学。和Botstein(2004)。此外,课程设计需要定义交流和学习的新途径,以绕开Tador和Tidmor(2005)进行研究生学习时传统的学科设置障碍。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Concordia University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Concordia University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Science education.;Bioinformatics.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 124 p.
  • 总页数 124
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号