首页> 外文学位 >The impact of nurses' professionalism from an innovative peer review committee.
【24h】

The impact of nurses' professionalism from an innovative peer review committee.

机译:创新的同行评审委员会对护士专业水平的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Peer review is a vital process through which nurses provide feedback to their peers in real time to advance their professional practice. The purpose of this scholarly project was to determine the impact of implementing an innovative peer review committee on nurses' professionalism.;Methods: A pilot project was conducted in a community hospital to evaluate nurses' professionalism following the design and implementation of a peer review committee. The project design was a pre- and post-interventional pilot study. The Nurse Professional Value Scale Revised (NPVS-R) was used to determine changes in nurses' (N=14) professionalism pre- and post- intervention. Additionally, NPVS-R scores were used to compare professionalism of nurses based on their educational and experiential backgrounds.;Results: The overall mean NPVS-R scores increased from 109.64 to 114.43from pre- to post- intervention; however, this was not a statistically significant change (p=0.347). The overall score of professionalism, a component of the NPVS-R, increased from 3.95 to 4.21, but this was not significant (p=0.359). When comparing the difference in professionalism scores between nurses with their Associate Degree in Nursing (ADN) and their Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) or Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) degrees pre-implementation, there was a significant difference between the two groups (p=0.038). Yet, post- intervention there was no significant difference between the two groups (p= 0.456). No statistically significant findings were found to show a difference in the level of professionalism according to the nurses' years of experience. Discussion: In this project, the implementation of a peer review committee resulted in increased professionalism scores; however, the change in scores was not statistically significant. This may be due to the small sample size. It is recommended that further research be conducted using a larger sample size to determine the impact of peer review on nurses' professionalism. The results did determine the implementation of a peer review committee improved professionalism scores for ADN prepared nurses and reduced the disparity between the ADN nurses and those with higher degree attainment. In organizations with high level of ADN prepared nurses, the implementation of a peer review committee could be utilized as a tool for increasing nurses' professionalism.
机译:背景:同行评审是一个至关重要的过程,护士可以通过该过程实时向同龄人提供反馈,以促进他们的专业执业。该学术项目的目的是确定实施创新的同行评议委员会对护士职业素养的影响。方法:在社区医院开展了一个试点项目,以评估和实施同行评议委员会,以评估护士的职业素养。 。该项目设计是干预前和干预后的初步研究。护士专业价值量表修订版(NPVS-R)用于确定干预前和干预后护士(N = 14)专业水平的变化。此外,NPVS-R得分用于根据护士的教育和经验背景来比较他们的专业水平。结果:从干预前到干预后,NPVS-R的总体平均得分从109.64上升到114.43。但是,这并不是统计学上的显着变化(p = 0.347)。作为NPVS-R的组成部分的专业素养总得分从3.95提高到4.21,但这并不显着(p = 0.359)。在比较护士与他们的护理学副学士学位(ADN)和其护理学理学学士学位(BSN)或护理学理学硕士(MSN)学历的实施之间的差异时,两者之间存在显着差异组(p = 0.038)。但是,干预后两组之间没有显着差异(p = 0.456)。根据护士的经验,没有发现统计学上显着的发现显示专业水平的差异。讨论:在该项目中,同行评审委员会的实施提高了专业水平。但是,分数的变化在统计上并不显着。这可能是由于样本量小。建议使用更大的样本量进行进一步研究,以确定同行评审对护士专业水平的影响。结果确实确定了同行评审委员会的实施,从而提高了ADN准备的护士的专业水平,并减少了ADN护士与具有较高学历的护士之间的差距。在ADN准备好的护士水平较高的组织中,可以将同行评审委员会的实施用作提高护士专业水平的工具。

著录项

  • 作者

    Goble, Patricia Hodge.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Charlotte.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Charlotte.;
  • 学科 Nursing.
  • 学位 D.N.P.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 48 p.
  • 总页数 48
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号