首页> 外文学位 >The social impact of a profession: An analysis of factors influencing ethics and the teaching of social responsibility in educational technology programs.
【24h】

The social impact of a profession: An analysis of factors influencing ethics and the teaching of social responsibility in educational technology programs.

机译:职业的社会影响:在教育技术计划中,分析影响道德和社会责任感的因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although professional ethics are considered critical to a profession's success, this content is often rarely covered in graduate level programs that train the future leaders. This study examined the specific ethic of social responsibility, looking at the degree to which it is present in programs, in faculty mindsets, and what factors might explain the absence or presence. Social responsibility was operationally defined using Kaufman's (2001) Elements of the Basic Ideal Vision. Other factors that were studied in relationship to social responsibility included demographics, philosophies of technology as defined by Feenberg (1999, 2001) and Barbour (1993), and barriers to integration based on human performance technology research and ethical behavior research (Ford & Richardson, 1994; Stolovich & Keeps, 1999). The results of this study from 169 participants indicated that the construct of social responsibility was a solid construct as measured by Kaufman's Elements of the Basic Ideal Vision, but faculty were not necessarily willing to be committed to it in their professional work. Only the Pessimism subscale of the philosophy instrument had a positive correlation to social responsibility. Furthermore, planning documents from 67 educational technology programs indicated no systematic efforts to integrate social responsibility into programs and vertically align it through program objectives, goals, missions and visions. The results, along with participant comments at the end of the survey, indicate that faculty in educational technology either have not made a paradigm shift to thinking about societal impact in their professional work or do not have a clear cognitive schema for social responsibility that would allow them to teach the content. Possibilities for future research are discussed.
机译:尽管职业道德被认为对某行业的成功至关重要,但是在培训未来领导者的研究生课程中,很少包含此内容。这项研究检查了社会责任的特定伦理,研究了它在课程中,教师心态中的存在程度以及哪些因素可以解释社会责任的缺失或存在。社会责任在业务上使用考夫曼(Kaufman,2001)的《基本理想构想》(Basic Ideal Vision)进行定义。与社会责任有关的其他因素还包括人口统计学,Feenberg(1999,2001)和Barbour(1993)定义的技术哲学以及基于人类绩效技术研究和道德行为研究的整合障碍(Ford&Richardson, 1994; Stolovich&Keeps,1999)。来自169名参与者的这项研究结果表明,按照考夫曼的《基本理想视野的要素》衡量,社会责任的构建是牢固的构建,但是教师不一定愿意在其专业工作中致力于这一工作。只有哲学工具的悲观主义量表与社会责任具有正相关。此外,来自67个教育技术计划的计划文件表明,没有系统地努力将社会责任纳入计划,并通过计划目标,宗旨,使命和愿景进行垂直调整。结果以及调查结束时的参与者评论表明,教育技术学院的教师要么没有在思维模式上转变为思考其专业工作中的社会影响,要么没有清晰的社会责任认知模式他们教的内容。讨论了未来研究的可能性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Moore, Stephanie L.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Northern Colorado.;

  • 授予单位 University of Northern Colorado.;
  • 学科 Education Technology.; Education Philosophy of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 209 p.
  • 总页数 209
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号