首页> 外文学位 >Motivational interviewing: Examining the therapeutic process.
【24h】

Motivational interviewing: Examining the therapeutic process.

机译:动机访谈:检查治疗过程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of motivational interviewing (MI)-based interventions, very few studies have examined the processes postulated to contribute to positive outcomes. The present study examined MI counseling sessions conducted within a group-randomized comparison-controlled trial for smoking cessation among 43 public housing residents (72% female; mean age = 47.9). MI-consistent therapist behaviors and subjective global ratings of "MI spirit" were examined as predictors of within-session observer-rated working alliance and client engagement. ANOVA analyses indicated the MI spirit index (average of the global ratings of collaboration, egalitarianism, and empathy) was a significant predictor of alliance and engagement, accounting for 44% and 45% of the variability respectively. Additionally, three covariates (treatment condition, session sequence, and counselor practice effect) were significant in the alliance and MI spirit model, while two (session sequence and counselor practice) were significant in the engagement and MI spirit model. Confrontation was significantly and negatively related to alliance whereas the association between confrontation and engagement was negative and approached significance (p = .13). Small to moderate effect sizes were found for affirming, asking open-ended questions, confronting, reflecting, and summarizing. Results provided evidence that MI spirit index and confrontation significantly relate to important within-session outcomes. Consistent with Miller and Rollnick's (2002) emphasis on the "MI spirit," results indicated this variable accounts for a large portion of alliance and engagement. In addition, any tears or ruptures in the alliance through the use of confrontation could significantly relate to poor treatment outcomes.
机译:尽管许多研究已经证明了基于动机面试(MI)的干预措施的有效性,但很少有研究检查了假定有助于积极结果的过程。本研究检查了在43位公共住房居民(72%的女性;平均年龄= 47.9)中戒烟的一项小组随机比较对照试验中进行的心梗咨询会议。 MI一致的治疗师行为和“ MI精神”的主观整体评分已作为会内观察员评分的工作联盟和客户参与度的预测指标进行了检验。 ANOVA分析表明,MI精神指数(协作,平均主义和同情心的全球平均评分)是联盟和敬业度的重要预测指标,分别占变异性的44%和45%。此外,在联盟和MI精神模型中,三个协变量(治疗条件,疗程顺序和辅导员实践效果)显着,而在参与和MI精神模型中两个变量(疗程顺序和辅导员实践)显着。对抗与同盟关系显着而负相关,而对抗与参与之间的联系则为负并接近显着性(p = .13)。人们发现影响程度小到中等,可以肯定,询问开放性问题,面对,反思和总结。结果提供了证据,表明MI精神指数和对抗与会议期间的重要结局显着相关。与Miller和Rollnick(2002)强调“ MI精神”相一致,结果表明此变量占联盟和参与的很大一部分。此外,通过使用对抗而在联盟中出现的任何眼泪或破裂都可能与不良的治疗结果密切相关。

著录项

  • 作者

    Boardman, Thuy Tran.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 Psychology Clinical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 59 p.
  • 总页数 59
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医学心理学、病理心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号