首页> 外文学位 >Is geography knowledge improving? A study of current geographic knowledge among United States college geography students.
【24h】

Is geography knowledge improving? A study of current geographic knowledge among United States college geography students.

机译:地理知识是否在进步?美国大学地理专业学生当前地理知识的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Studies over the past fifty years have reported that United States citizens scored poorly on geographic knowledge tests. It has been the perception of the author that college students from different parts of the United States vary in their geographic knowledge base. Thus the problem of this study was to determine how well college geography students scored on a researcher developed test instrument of geographic knowledge and to examine the resulting regional test score patterns. To do so the author developed a geography-based test instrument and distributed it nationwide. Responses from 1,004 students in 39 different states were analyzed. Spatial analysis of scores was performed based upon the eight geographic regions of the United States, as defined in the 1997 Rand McNally classroom atlas.; Scores ranged from 3 to 26 correct answers, with an overall mean of 17.88 and a standard deviation of 3.622. Of the 1,004 respondents, 98.8% scored within two standard deviations of the mean. Using the total number of possible correct answers, the mean percentage correct was 68.8%.; A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) compared the mean scores for the continuous/dependent variable, (number of correct answers) with the independent/categorical variable (state/region). When a statistically significant difference was found, a Scheffe post-hoc was performed to determine which regions accounted for the difference(s). Post-hoc analysis eliminated three regions, the Great Plains, Mid Atlantic, and Midwest, from further review due to the small number of responses. As a result of this study statistically significant differences in basic geographic knowledge were found to exist between the Northeast, Pacific, Rocky Mountain, South, and Southwest regions.
机译:过去五十年的研究报告说,美国公民在地理知识测试中得分很低。作者一直认为,来自美国不同地区的大学生的地理知识基础各不相同。因此,本研究的问题是确定大学地理学生在研究人员开发的地理知识测试工具上的得分情况,并检查由此产生的区域测试得分模式。为此,作者开发了一种基于地理的测试仪器,并在全国范围内分发。分析了来自39个州的1,004名学生的回答。分数的空间分析是根据1997年Rand McNally教室地图集所定义的美国八个地理区域进行的。分数范围为3到26个正确答案,总体平均分为17.88,标准偏差为3.622。在1,004名受访者中,有98.8%的得分在平均值的两个标准差内。使用可能的正确答案的总数,正确率的平均百分比为68.8%。单向方差分析(ANOVA)将连续/因变量(正确答案的数量)的平均得分与自/分类变量(状态/区域)进行了比较。当发现统计学上的显着差异时,进行事后(Scheffe)事后分析以确定哪些区域造成了差异。事后分析由于回应数量少,因此排除了三个地区,即大平原,中大西洋和中西部。这项研究的结果是,发现东北,太平洋,落基山,南部和西南地区之间存在基本地理知识的统计学显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号