首页> 外文学位 >A comparison of faculty time requirements in online and traditional course formats: Health science and non-health science courses.
【24h】

A comparison of faculty time requirements in online and traditional course formats: Health science and non-health science courses.

机译:在线和传统课程格式中教师时间要求的比较:健康科学和非健康科学课程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study assessed the difference in time spent in the preparation, delivery and evaluation of online and traditional graduate courses. Seventy-nine faculty members from thirty-eight colleges and universities all located within one accreditation association for schools and colleges, who also taught the same graduate course both online and traditionally completed an online questionnaire on course preparation, delivery and evaluation. Results showed that online courses required more faculty time in Course Preparation, t(71) = 2.365, p = .021, d = .4, Course Delivery t(71) = 4.72, p .0001, d = .50, and Course Evaluation t(70) = .323, p = .977, d = .04 than did the similar traditional courses. Factors such as gender, course discipline, academic rank, and employment status were evaluated with regards to faculty time requirements in each course type, online and traditional. Gender was statistically significant with regards to course delivery in both an online and a traditional course, F (1,70) = 4.32, p = .041, females taking more time in each type of course.; When Health and Social Science courses were compared with other courses, the course discipline type did not affect the faculty time requirements significantly F (1,70) = 1.273, p = .278, d = .39. The time requirements for faculty to deliver Health and Social Science courses and other courses are not statistically different. Academic rank, F (4.72) = 1.018, p = .405, d = .80 and employment status F (1,70) = .061, p = .806, d = .04, also did not make a statistically significant difference in terms of faculty time spent in course delivery. Faculty time requirements to deliver an online course took significantly more time when compared to a traditional course regardless of employment status, academic rank, course discipline and faculty gender. Based on the findings of the study, current faculty workload with respect to online and traditional course management needs to be adjusted.
机译:这项研究评估了在线和传统研究生课程的准备,交付和评估所花费的时间差异。来自38个学院和大学的79名教职员工均位于一个学校和学院的认可协会内,他们还在线教授同一门研究生课程,并且传统上完成了有关课程准备,交付和评估的在线问卷。结果表明,在线课程在课程准备方面需要更多的教师时间,t(71)= 2.365,p = .021,d = .4,课程交付时间t(71)= 4.72,p <.0001,d = .50,和与类似的传统课程相比,课程评估t(70)= .323,p = .977,d = .04。根据在线和传统两种课程类型中教师的时间要求,评估了诸如性别,课程纪律,学历和就业状况等因素。在在线课程和传统课程中,性别在统计学上均具有统计学意义,F(1,70)= 4.32,p = .041,女性在每种课程中花费更多的时间。当将健康与社会科学课程与其他课程进行比较时,课程的学科类型并未显着影响教师的时间要求F(1,70)= 1.273,p = .278,d = .39。在统计学上,教师提供健康与社会科学课程和其他课程的时间要求没有差异。学术排名F(4.72)= 1.018,p = .405,d = .80和就业状况F(1,70)= .061,p = .806,d = 0.04,也没有统计学差异就课程交付所花费的教职时间而言。与传统课程相比,与在线课程相比,教授在线课程所需的教师时间要多得多,而无论其就业状况,学历,课程纪律和教师性别如何。根据研究结果,需要调整当前教师在在线和传统课程管理方面的工作量。

著录项

  • 作者

    Holt, Karyn.;

  • 作者单位

    Touro University International.;

  • 授予单位 Touro University International.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.; Education Technology.; Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 173 p.
  • 总页数 173
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育;教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号