首页> 外文学位 >Constitutional jurisprudence in the supreme court of Venezuela.
【24h】

Constitutional jurisprudence in the supreme court of Venezuela.

机译:委内瑞拉最高法院的宪法学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The prime focus of this dissertation consists in exploring constitutional jurisprudence in the Supreme Court of Venezuela over the last five decades, making use of arguments drawn from Venezuelan history and the existing jurisprudential approaches to theories about the general character of law as integrated in numerous public law cases. This study offers a new approach, one that focuses on ensuring that fundamental constitutional principles are aligned with the concrete objectives (purposes) that the Constitution sets out to achieve. This account is developed through a theoretical framework comprising of: I. A historical overview from independence (1811) to democratization (1947 and beyond), emphasizing the fundamentals of the Constitutions of 1961 and 1999, to portray a vivid and accurate picture of the origins of Venezuela's constitutional democracy; II. A survey, of constitutional cases that illustrates the evolution of the Venezuelan constitutional jurisprudence under the overt or subliminal use of certain default legal theories, namely, legal positivism in the era of the 1961 Constitution, legal realism and Ronald Dworkin's adjudication theory in the era of the 1999 Constitution III. An insightful discussion of the main arguments of Ronald Dworkin's principled theory and Justice Aharon Barak's purposive theory, in an effort to build theorectical support, which links the various points of their respective theories in order to articulate one in the context of the Venezuelan jurisprudence; IV An original attempt to build a theoretical approach based on the Venezuelan constitutional system, history, culture, and identity to bring together the priorities of formalism, particularly the written principles of the Constitution and the priorities of functionalism and social welfare. This is to ensure that the Supreme Court decides accordingly with the constitutional principles as much as their underlying purposes to provide solutions to legal conundrums.
机译:本论文的主要重点在于,在过去的五十年中,在委内瑞拉最高法院探索宪法法理学,利用委内瑞拉历史上的论点以及现有法学方法论将法律的一般性特征理论纳入众多公法中案件。这项研究提供了一种新方法,其重点是确保基本宪法原则与宪法规定要实现的具体目标(目的)保持一致。这一说明是通过以下理论框架建立的:I.从独立(1811)到民主化(1947年及以后)的历史回顾,强调1961年和1999年宪法的基本原理,以生动生动地描绘出其起源委内瑞拉的宪政民主;二。一项宪法案件的调查,说明了委内瑞拉宪法判例在某些默认法律理论(即1961年宪法时代的法律实证主义,法律现实主义和罗纳德·德沃金的审判理论)公开或潜意识使用下的演变。 1999年宪法III。对罗纳德·德沃金的原则性理论和阿哈龙·巴拉克大法官的有目的理论的主要论点进行了有见地的讨论,以期建立理论支持,将其各自理论的各个方面联系起来,以便在委内瑞拉法学背景下阐明一个理论观点; IV最初尝试建立基于委内瑞拉宪法制度,历史,文化和身份的理论方法,以将形式主义的优先事项,尤其是宪法的成文原则以及功能主义和社会福利的优先事项结合在一起。这是为了确保最高法院根据宪法原则以及其基本目的作出相应判决,以为法律难题提供解决方案。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Ottawa (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Ottawa (Canada).;
  • 学科 International law.;Latin American studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 378 p.
  • 总页数 378
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号