首页> 外文学位 >Scramble for the rocks: The disputes over the Dokdo/Takeshima, Senkaku/Diaoyu, and Paracel and Spratly Islands.
【24h】

Scramble for the rocks: The disputes over the Dokdo/Takeshima, Senkaku/Diaoyu, and Paracel and Spratly Islands.

机译:争夺岩石:关于独岛/竹岛,尖阁/钓鱼岛,西沙群岛和南沙群岛的争端。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation, I explore the three most prominent island disputes in East Asia: the Dokdo/Takeshima, the Senkaku/Diaoyu, and the Paracel and Spratly disputes. These island disputes clearly illustrate the puzzling pattern of continuity and mutual restraint in East Asia's territorial conflicts. In dealing with sovereignty issues, East Asian countries have engaged in varied patterns of diplomatic and military behaviors. In some cases, one can find examples of the aggressive use of military force and intransigent bargaining strategies, while in others military inaction and accommodative diplomacy are equally evident. When and why do disputants pursue conflictual policies? Conversely, why do they at other times seek the containment, if not the resolution, of territorial disputes by shelving thorny sovereignty issues?; I use a territorial bargaining game framework to analyze various stages of dispute initiation, escalation, and de-escalation in a consistent and systematic manner. I start from an assumption that territory involves mixed motive games, which can be characterized as having elements of partnership, competition, and conflict. Consistent with conventional wisdom, I find that the combination of resource competition, fluid geopolitics, and unstable domestic power dynamics has regularly brought about the initiation and escalation of the three island disputes. More importantly, I discover that the pacific influence of economic interdependence has repeatedly prevented the sovereignty disputes from escalating into a full-scale diplomatic and/or military crisis.; In view of the rising pressure of territorial nationalism and fluid geopolitics in the post-Cold War and post-9-11 era, even the mere containment of these island disputes requires the skillful diplomacy and tireless efforts of political leaders. The best strategy to hedge against potentially disruptive behaviors is to engage more with each other by facilitating greater economic interdependence. The path to deeper and wider economic integration is likely to be a bumpy one, but the burgeoning efforts to form free trade agreements among the countries in East Asia may help to smooth it.
机译:在这篇论文中,我探讨了东亚地区最重要的三个岛屿纠纷:独岛/竹岛,尖阁阁/钓鱼岛以及西沙群岛和南沙群岛纠纷。这些岛屿争端清楚地说明了东亚领土冲突中令人困惑的连续性和相互克制的模式。在处理主权问题时,东亚国家采取了各种形式的外交和军事行为。在某些情况下,可以找到一些例子,它们表明了积极使用军事力量和不妥协的讨价还价策略的例子,而在另一些情况下,军事不作为和包容外交也同样明显。争端何时何地奉行冲突政策?相反,为什么他们在其他时候却通过搁置棘手的主权问题来寻求遏制(即使不是解决)领土争端?我使用区域议价博弈框架以一致且系统的方式分析了争议引发,升级和降级的各个阶段。我从一个假设出发,即领土涉及混合动机游戏,这种游戏可以被描述为具有伙伴关系,竞争和冲突的要素。与传统观点一致,我发现资源竞争,动荡的地缘政治和不稳定的国内动力动态的结合经常导致三起岛屿争端的发生和升级。更重要的是,我发现,经济相互依存的和平影响一再阻止主权争端升级为全面的外交和/或军事危机。鉴于在冷战后和9-11以后的时代,领土民族主义和地缘政治的压力不断上升,即使仅对这些岛屿争端的遏制也需要政治领导人的熟练外交和不懈的努力。应对潜在破坏性行为的最佳策略是通过促进更大的经济相互依存关系而相互参与。深入和广泛地实现经济一体化的道路可能是一条坎but的道路,但东亚国家之间为达成自由贸易协定而进行的迅速努力可能有助于使之平稳。

著录项

  • 作者

    Koo, Min Gyo.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 287 p.
  • 总页数 287
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号