首页> 外文学位 >Educators' understanding and implications of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
【24h】

Educators' understanding and implications of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.

机译:教育工作者对《 2001年不让任何孩子落后法案》的理解和启示。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Public school educators are required to implement and to meet the goals of the federal education reform, No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. This comprehensive legislation provides a prescriptive format that educators must follow and all children are to improve regardless of ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, disabilities, home environment or parental support. Reeves (2003) suggest that the implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), particularly, but not limited to, the accountability and assessment provisions requiring all students to meet the academic performance standards established by each state by 2013--2014, will present challenges to districts, schools and educators.; Kane, Staiger and Geppert (2002) imply that NCLB is "seriously flawed" and that the problems embedded in the federal education reform are daunting. They further suggest that while the federal policy was designed to correct problems in public education, it creates myriad other problems.; As schools across the nation implement the new law, the purpose of this study is to examine the understanding of NCLB and its implications as perceived by educators and to determine: (1) if there are any significant differences between classroom teachers and building level administrators in their professed understanding and their perceived implications of NCLB; and (2) to examine differences between educators' of Title I and non-Title I schools understanding and perceived implications of the law.
机译:公立学校的教育工作者必须执行并实现联邦教育改革的目标,即《 2001年不让任何儿童落后法案》。这项全面的立法规定了教育工作者必须遵循的规定形式,所有儿童都应得到改善,无论种族,性别,社会经济状况如何。身份,残疾,家庭环境或父母的支持。里夫斯(2003)建议实施《 2001年不让任何孩子落后法案》(NCLB),尤其是但不限于责任制和评估规定,要求所有学生必须在2013年前达到每个州制定的学业成绩标准- 2014年,将对地区,学校和教育工作者提出挑战。 Kane,Staiger和Geppert(2002)暗示NCLB存在“严重缺陷”,而联邦教育改革中所隐含的问题令人生畏。他们进一步建议,尽管联邦政策旨在纠正公共教育中的问题,但它还会产生许多其他问题。随着全国各地学校实施新法律,本研究的目的是检验教育工作者对NCLB的理解及其含义,并确定:(1)课堂教师和建筑管理者之间是否存在重大差异?他们自称的理解及其对NCLB的理解; (2)研究第一名和非第一名教育者对法律的理解和理解之间的差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kirk, Silvya A.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Oklahoma.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Oklahoma.;
  • 学科 Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 200 p.
  • 总页数 200
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号