首页> 外文学位 >Humanity's publics: NGOs, journalism, and the international public sphere.
【24h】

Humanity's publics: NGOs, journalism, and the international public sphere.

机译:人类的公众:非政府组织,新闻界和国际公共领域。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As legacy news outlets slash foreign news budgets, international NGOs have been discussed as sources of both promise and caution with respect to the future of foreign news -- for journalists, for advocates and for citizens. To optimists, NGOs provide original, insightful reporting from neglected areas of the world. To skeptics, the influence of such groups augurs a worrisome conflation of the lines between advocacy and journalism, with deleterious consequences befalling both parties. This dissertation tests these competing claims by asking what the information work of NGOs is, what types of news coverage they support and whether NGOs expand or reinforce established patterns of international news attention.;The dissertation puts forward three primary findings. First, NGO information work is neither singular nor shaped entirely by the preferences of the news media. Instead, both NGOs and news media are internally differentiated between elite and general public sectors and the international differentiations correspond to different relations across sectors -- making interactions between elite-oriented NGOs and the prestige press much more likely than interactions, and vice versa. Second, different relationships between NGOs and news outlets shape different types of news coverage, including a policy/elite set of discussions conducted in the prestige press and oriented towards high-level decision-making; and also a discourse of donation and charity in search of potential donors. Third, the capacity of NGOs to live up to their stated missions of raising awareness of neglected parts of the world depends on where they seek publicity. A group's capacity to bring countries from outside the media spotlight into it is most likely to occur in the prestige press, not the broadcast media.;The dissertation concludes by evaluating the normative implications of the research findings. If one sees the role of public communication as mediating between experts, the data provide room of cautious optimism. NGOs that align with the prestige press constitute a modest expansion of elites and allow for civil society perspectives to be articulated in elite discussions. If, however, one sees the role of NGOs as raising general public awareness of issues outside the media spotlight, the space for optimism diminishes greatly.
机译:随着传统新闻机构削减外国新闻预算,国际非政府组织已被讨论为外国新闻的未来-对记者,拥护者和公民而言,既有希望,也有谨慎。对于乐观主义者,非政府组织提供来自世界被忽视地区的原始,有见地的报告。对于怀疑论者来说,这些团体的影响预示着将倡导和新闻之间的界线令人担忧地混为一谈,对双方都造成了有害的后果。本文通过询问非政府组织的信息工作是什么,它们所支持的新闻报道类型以及非政府组织是否扩大或加强了国际新闻关注的既定模式,来检验这些相互竞争的主张。论文提出了三个主要发现。首先,非政府组织的信息工作既不是单一的,也不是完全由新闻媒体的偏好决定的。取而代之的是,非政府组织和新闻媒体内部在精英和普通公共部门之间是有区别的,而国际差异则对应于跨部门的不同关系-使得面向精英的非政府组织和声望媒体之间的互动比互动更有可能发生,反之亦然。其次,非政府组织与新闻媒体之间的不同关系影响着不同类型的新闻报道,包括在声望新闻界进行的,面向高层决策的政策/精英讨论。以及关于捐赠和慈善的讨论,以寻找潜在的捐助者。第三,非政府组织履行其既定使命以提高对世界被忽视地区的认识的能力取决于他们在哪里寻求宣传。一个小组将国家从媒体之外吸引到人们的能力最有可能发生在声望新闻界,而不是广播媒体上。论文的结论是通过评估研究结果的规范含义而得出的结论。如果人们将公共传播的作用视为专家之间的中介,则数据提供了谨慎乐观的余地。与声望媒体保持一致的非政府组织构成了精英阶层的适度扩张,并允许在精英讨论中阐明民间社会的观点。但是,如果人们认为非政府组织在提高公众对媒体关注之外的问题的认识方面的作用,那么乐观的空间就会大大减少。

著录项

  • 作者

    Powers, Matthew.;

  • 作者单位

    New York University.;

  • 授予单位 New York University.;
  • 学科 Speech Communication.;Journalism.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 301 p.
  • 总页数 301
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号