首页> 外文学位 >Plastic Recognition: The Politics and Aesthetics of Facial Representation from Silent Cinema to Cognitive Neuroscience.
【24h】

Plastic Recognition: The Politics and Aesthetics of Facial Representation from Silent Cinema to Cognitive Neuroscience.

机译:可塑性识别:从无声电影到认知神经科学的面部表征的政治和美学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Plastic Recognition traces a critical genealogy of the human face in cinema and its afterlives. By rethinking the history of film theory through its various investments in the face, it seeks to intervene not only in the discipline of film studies but more broadly within contemporary political and scientific discourse. This dissertation contends that the face is a privileged site for thinking through the question of recognition, a concept that cuts across a range of aesthetic, political, philosophical, and scientific thought. Plastic Recognition examines this intimate link between the face and recognition through a return to "classical" film theory, and specifically to the first generation of European and Soviet film theorists' preoccupation with the face in silent cinema. In the process, it recasts the canonical debate over cinematic specificity between Bela Balazs and Sergei Eisenstein as an antagonism between two opposing conceptions of the face in film: transparent universalism versus plastic typicality. Of these two conceptions, this project contends that the "Balazsian" idea of a transparently expressive face assumes cultural dominance in the latter half of the 20th century by virtue of its essential commensurability with the political and social ideal of mutual recognition that has come to prevail in the United States and Western Europe in the context of neoliberalism. Alongside and against this dominant tendency, the "Eisensteinian" insistence upon the plasticity of aesthetic form provides a radical alternative to the idealist metaphysics of immediacy underlying both the "Balazsian" notion of the cinematic face and the ideal of mutual recognition it exemplifies. That insistence forces into view the ways that recognition itself is always contingent upon aesthetic and technological practices, even (or especially) when it is brokered by that seemingly most immediate of images---the human face. By adopting this approach as its basic critical orientation, this dissertation attempts to restage the problem of recognition as fundamentally about the historicity of plastic form. The project concludes by turning to a scientific scene of recognition in which the "Balazsian" conception of the face makes an uncanny reappearance. The final chapter examines several studies in contemporary neuroscience that use representations of the human face as experimental stimuli in an effort to establish a neurophysiological basis for the mutual recognition of empathy.
机译:塑料识别技术可追溯电影及其后世中人脸的重要谱系。通过面对电影理论的各种投资来重新思考电影理论的历史,它不仅试图干预电影研究学科,而且更广泛地干预当代政治和科学话语。本文认为,人脸是通过识别问题进行思考的特权场所,该概念跨越了美学,政治,哲学和科学思想的范围。 Plastic Recognition通过回归“古典”电影理论,特别是欧洲和苏联第一代电影理论家对静默电影中对面部的关注,来研究面部与识别之间的紧密联系。在此过程中,它重现了贝拉·巴拉兹(Bela Balazs)和谢尔盖·爱森斯坦(Sergei Eisenstein)之间关于电影特殊性的规范辩论,认为这是电影中两个相对面孔概念之间的对抗:透明的普遍性与可塑性的典型性。在这两个概念中,该项目认为,具有透明表现力的“巴拉兹式”思想在20世纪下半叶具有文化优势,因为它与普遍认可的政治和社会理想具有可比性在新自由主义背景下的美国和西欧。与这种主要趋势并存的是,“爱森斯坦主义”对美学形式的可塑性的坚持提供了一种即时性的理想主义形而上学的根本替代方法,这种理想主义的形而上学即代表了电影面孔的“巴拉兹主义”概念,又体现了它所体现的相互认可的理想。这种坚持迫使人们认识到认知本身总是取决于美学和技术实践的方式,即使(或尤其是)当认知是由看似最直接的图像(人脸)促成的。通过采用这种方法作为其基本的批判性取向,本文试图从根本上解决关于塑性形式的历史性的认识问题。该项目通过转向科学的认可场景而结束,在该场景中,“ Balazsian”的面孔概念令人难以置信地再现。最后一章考察了当代神经科学中的几项研究,这些研究使用人脸的表征作为实验刺激,从而为相互理解共情建立了神经生理学基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    Geil, Abraham.;

  • 作者单位

    Duke University.;

  • 授予单位 Duke University.;
  • 学科 Cinema.;Biology Neuroscience.;Philosophy.;Aesthetics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 214 p.
  • 总页数 214
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号