首页> 外文学位 >Flood forecasting on the Humber River using an artificial neural network approach.
【24h】

Flood forecasting on the Humber River using an artificial neural network approach.

机译:使用人工神经网络方法对亨伯河进行洪水预报。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In order to provide flood warnings to the residents living along the various sections of the Humber River Basin, the Water Resources Management Division (WRMD) of Department of Environment and Conservation, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador has generated flow forecasts for this basin over the years by means of several rainfall-runoff models. The first model used is the well-known Streamflow Synthesis and Reservoir Regulation Model (SSARR) which is a deterministic model that accounts for some or all of the hydrologic factors responsible for runoff in the basin. However, the accuracy of the model became worse over the years. Although it was calibrated well in the beginning, recalibration of the model has not been very successful. In addition, the model cannot take into account the snowmelt effect from the Upper Humber basin. The next model is the Dynamic Regression model, a statistically based model that uses the time series of historic flows and climate data of the basin to generate a forecast. This model was tried during the late 1990s to early 2000s. This model was found to provide better forecasts than the SSARR model, but it also does not take into account the snowmelt effect from the upper regions of the Humber River. The third model tried by the WRMD was an in-house Routing model. This method uses a series of water balance equations which can be easily implemented on a spread sheet at each gauging station. However, calibration is done subjectively and the forecast obtained for the snowy region of the Upper Humber is still a problem. In view of the foregoing issues with the above models, a better model that is easy to use and calibrate, provides accurate forecasts, and one that can take into account the snowmelt effects is required. Since 2008, the WRMD has been using the statistically based Dynamic Regression Model on an interim basis until a replacement model could be developed.;This thesis presents the development of artificial neural network (ANN) models for river flow forecasting for the Humber River Basin. Two types of ANN were considered, general regression neural network (GRNN) and the back propagation neural network (BPNN). GRNN is a nonparametric method with no training parameters to be adjusted during the training process. BPNN on the other hand has several parameters such as the learning rate, momentum, and calibration interval, which can be adjusted during the training to improve the model. A design of experiment (DOE) approach is used to study the effects of the various inputs and network parameters at various stages of the network development to obtain an optimal model. One day ahead forecasts were obtained from the two ANNs using air temperature, precipitation, cumulative degree-days, and flow data all suitably lagged (Le. of I day or 2 day before) as inputs. It was found that the GRNN model produced slightly better forecasts than the BPNN for the Upper Humber and both models performed equally well for the Lower Humber. The ANN approach also produced much better forecasts than the routing model developed by the WRMD but was not much better than the dynamic regression model except for the Upper Humber.
机译:为了向居住在亨伯河流域各地的居民提供洪水预警,多年来,纽芬兰省和拉布拉多省环境与自然保护部水资源管理司(WRMD)对该流域进行了流量预报通过几种降雨径流模型。使用的第一个模型是众所周知的“流量综合和储层调节模型”(SSARR),该模型是确定性模型,可以解释造成流域径流的部分或全部水文因素。但是,这些年来,模型的准确性变得越来越差。尽管在一开始就对其进行了很好的校准,但是对模型的重新校准并不是很成功。另外,该模型不能考虑上亨伯盆地的融雪效应。下一个模型是动态回归模型,这是一个基于统计的模型,该模型使用历史流量的时间序列和流域的气候数据来生成预测。在1990年代末至2000年代初尝试了该模型。发现该模型比SSARR模型提供了更好的预测,但它也没有考虑到亨伯河上游地区的融雪效应。 WRMD尝试的第三个模型是内部路由模型。该方法使用了一系列水平衡方程,可以在每个计量站的电子表格上轻松实现这些平衡方程。但是,校准是主观地进行的,对上亨伯郡的下雪地区获得的预报仍然是一个问题。鉴于上述模型的前述问题,需要一种更好的模型,该模型易于使用和校准,提供准确的预测,并且需要一种能够考虑融雪效应的模型。自2008年以来,WRMD在过渡基础上一直使用基于统计的动态回归模型,直到可以开发替代模型为止。;本文介绍了人工神经网络(ANN)模型在汉伯河流域的河流流量预测中的发展。考虑了两种类型的ANN:通用回归神经网络(GRNN)和反向传播神经网络(BPNN)。 GRNN是一种非参数方法,无需在训练过程中调整训练参数。另一方面,BPNN具有几个参数,例如学习速率,动量和校准间隔,可以在训练过程中对其进行调整以改进模型。实验设计(DOE)方法用于研究网络开发各个阶段的各种输入和网络参数的影响,以获得最佳模型。使用气温,降水量,累积度日数和流量数据都适当地滞后了(I天或前2天的Le)作为输入,从这两个ANN获得了提前一天的预报。结果发现,对于上汉伯来说,GRNN模型产生的预测要比BPNN稍好,而对于下汉伯来说,两种模型的表现都一样好。与WRMD开发的路由模型相比,人工神经网络方法还产生了更好的预测,但除了上亨伯以外,没有比动态回归模型好得多。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cai, Haijie.;

  • 作者单位

    Memorial University of Newfoundland (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Memorial University of Newfoundland (Canada).;
  • 学科 Engineering Geological.;Engineering Environmental.
  • 学位 M.Eng.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 98 p.
  • 总页数 98
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 普通生物学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号