首页> 外文学位 >A historical analysis of South Holland School District 151 desegregation order: An examination of superintendent decisions based on board actions grounded in the context of prevailing social, political, legal and educational conditions for the period 1967-2010.
【24h】

A historical analysis of South Holland School District 151 desegregation order: An examination of superintendent decisions based on board actions grounded in the context of prevailing social, political, legal and educational conditions for the period 1967-2010.

机译:对南荷兰学区151种族隔离顺序的历史分析:基于基于1967-2010年主要社会,政治,法律和教育条件的董事会行动对管理者决策的审查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study provided a historical analysis of the 1968 court ordered desegregation of South Holland School District 151. The purpose of this case study was to examine, according to primary source evidence, how the superintendents grounded their decisions within the prevailing social, political, legal and educational conditions of the time. The researcher applied the leadership framework of Sergiovanni's Five Sources of Authority by identifying words and actions of superintendents that support a source of authority. This case study sought to identify how the decisions made, actions taken, and resulting changes created a new context for each succeeding superintendent to operate within. This case study also examined how each superintendent brought awareness to the board of the prevailing social, political, legal, and educational conditions of the time as the rationale for the need to develop policy and/or make decisions. An examination of the board's policies and/or decisions was made to identify what values were represented based on a superintendent's contextual descriptions of the district's needs.;This study began with the early history of the Village of South Holland and examined the religious and political influences that guided the transformation to a suburban setting from a rural community. The study followed the development of South Holland School District 151; examined the factors that contributed to the charges of unequal treatment by the African American Phoenix community; and concluded with the process of desegregation and the impact upon the school community.
机译:这项研究对1968年下令对南荷兰学区151进行种族隔离的法院进行了历史分析。本案例研究的目的是根据主要来源证据研究院长如何根据当时的社会,政治,法律和司法依据做出其决定。当时的教育条件。研究人员通过识别支持权威来源的管理者的言行,运用了塞尔吉奥万尼的“五个权威来源”的领导框架。本案例研究试图确定决策,采取的行动以及由此产生的变更如何为每个后续的主管在其中进行操作创造了新的环境。该案例研究还研究了每个主管如何使董事会了解当时的主要社会,政治,法律和教育条件,以此作为制定政策和/或做出决策的依据。对董事会的政策和/或决策进行了审查,以根据主管对该地区需求的上下文描述来确定代表了哪些价值观;该研究始于南荷兰村的早期历史,并考察了宗教和政治影响引导了农村社区向郊区的转型。该研究遵循了南荷兰学区151的发展;研究了造成非裔美国人凤凰社不平等待遇指控的因素;并得出了种族隔离的过程及其对学校社区的影响。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Loyola University Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 Loyola University Chicago.;
  • 学科 Educational leadership.;Educational administration.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 306 p.
  • 总页数 306
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号