首页> 外文学位 >Source influence model for collective action: Online source effects on individuals' willingness to participate in different thresholds of collective activities.
【24h】

Source influence model for collective action: Online source effects on individuals' willingness to participate in different thresholds of collective activities.

机译:集体行动的源影响模型:在线源影响个人参与集体活动的不同阈值的意愿。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Social movements facilitated by online communication platforms such as social media are known for their sudden appearance and rapid mobilization. But there has been a lack of studies examining the potential for social influence to mobilize support for activist organizations in the online realm. This study bridges the gap by examining individuals' willingness to participate in different forms of collective activities (e.g., online versus offline, low- versus mid- versus high thresholds) upon receiving invitational messages from different sources online through a communicative framework for collective action and "online connective action.".;An online between-groups, post-test-only experiment was carried out, manipulating for message sources (e.g., close personal circles, distant social network, experts and authority figures, organizational sources) and controlling for dispositional variables (e.g., personal involvement with activism and issue, ideological orientation, attitude toward activism, and perceived efficacy). Data was collected from 422 undergraduates enrolled in a large southeastern university in the United States.;Findings revealed that messages passed by members in one's close personal networks are significantly more influential than those passed by less personal sources. Individuals also expressed greater willingness to participate in online forms of collective activities (e.g., provide donations, sign e-petitions, post comments, relaying the message, "Like" the message, "Follow" the online group, etc.) as compared to offline ones (e.g., participate in public demonstrations, distribute campaign materials, use campaign items in public, etc.). Interestingly, contrary to prior postulations, findings showed that individuals were more willing to participate in online activities that compromised certain levels of privacy as opposed to anonymous ones. An online source influence model for collective action was then tested and forwarded in this study.;Discussions elaborated on the significance of the "personal" nature of influence for collective action and the diminishing role of the organization in the online realm; suggesting the possible proliferation of grassroots activism propelled by today's socially networked online environment. From an interpersonal communicatory effects viewpoint, the findings also provided evidence on the importance of a communicative approach in explaining online collective action beyond the discursive perspectives that are widely adopted by prior studies.
机译:由在线交流平台(如社交媒体)推动的社交运动以其突然出现和快速动员而闻名。但是,缺乏研究来检验社会影响力动员在线领域中的激进组织的潜力的研究。这项研究通过在通过沟通方式从集体渠道收集来自不同来源的邀请信息后,通过检查个人参加不同形式的集体活动(例如,在线与离线,低门槛,中门槛与高门槛)的意愿来弥合差距。 “在线联系行动”。进行了网上小组间,仅限测试后的实验,操纵消息来源(例如,亲密的个人圈子,遥远的社交网络,专家和权威人物,组织来源)并控制性格变量(例如,个人对行动主义和议题的参与,意识形态取向,对行动主义的态度以及感知的效能)。数据是从美国东南部一所大型大学的422名本科生中收集的;研究结果表明,成员在一个紧密的个人网络中传递的信息比那些不那么私人的信息传递的信息具有更大的影响力。与之相比,个人还更愿意参加在线形式的集体活动(例如,提供捐赠,签署电子请愿书,发表评论,转发消息,“喜欢”消息,“关注”在线小组等)。离线活动(例如,参加公共演示,分发活动材料,在公共场合使用活动项目等)。有趣的是,与先前的假设相反,研究结果表明,与匿名用户相比,个人更愿意参与破坏某些级别隐私的在线活动。然后在本研究中测试并转发了一个在线的集体行动影响力模型。;讨论了集体行动影响力的“个人”性质的重要性以及组织在网络领域中的作用逐渐减弱;暗示了当今社交网络环境推动的基层激进主义激增的可能性。从人际交往效果的角度来看,研究结果还提供了证据,证明了交往方法在解释网络集体行动方面的重要性,这超出了先前研究广泛采用的话语视角。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nekmat, Mohamed Elmie B.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Alabama.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Alabama.;
  • 学科 Communication.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 242 p.
  • 总页数 242
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号