首页> 外文学位 >Microtensile bond strength of different acrylic teeth to high-impact denture base resins.
【24h】

Microtensile bond strength of different acrylic teeth to high-impact denture base resins.

机译:不同丙烯酸牙齿对高冲击力义齿基料树脂的微拉伸粘合强度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the effect of denture base acrylic, denture tooth composition, and ridge lap surface treatment on the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) of three different commercially available denture teeth and two injection denture processing systems.;MATERIALS and METHODS: Sixteen experimental groups were formed (n=3), according to denture tooth surface treatment (no treatment or surface treatment recommended by the manufacturer), denture base processing technique and acrylic (SRIvocap- Ivocap Plus or Success-Lucitone 199), and tooth type-composition at bonding interface (BlueLine DCL-PMMA, Portrait IPN-PMMA, Phonares II-PMMA, Phonares II-NHC). Rectangular bar specimens with a cross sectional area of 1mm2 were fabricated and subsequently thermocycled at 10,000 cycles between 5°C and 55°C with 15 sec dwell time. Select specimens underwent microTBS testing in a Universal Testing Machine (Instron) with a 1 kN load cell at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. Data were analyzed statistically by two and three-way ANOVAs and Tukey post hoc test (alpha=0.05).;RESULTS: Mean microTBS ranged between 56.2 +/- 5.6 to 60.8 +/- 5.0 (N/mm2) for the Ivocap Plus specimens and 13.3 +/- 5.12 to 60.1 +/- 6.0 (N/mm2) for the Lucitone 199 specimens. Among the Ivocap specimens, BlueLine DCL and Phonares II NHC had significantly higher microTBS than Portrait IPN to Ivocap Plus acrylic. There were no statistically significant differences among Blueline, Phonares PMMA and Phonares NHC, or between Phonares PMMA and Portrait IPN. Within the Luctione 199 specimens, there was a significantly higher microTBS for BlueLine DCL and Phonares II NHC denture teeth with the manufacturer recommended surface treatment when compared to control surface. BlueLine, Portrait, and Phonares PMMA groups achieved significantly higher mean microTBS than the Phonares NHC group. There were no statistically significant differences among BlueLine, Portrait and Phonares PMMA groups.;CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this experimental study, the results suggest that the type of denture base material, denture tooth composition, and surface treatment have an influence upon the microtensile bond strength between certain types of highly crosslinked denture teeth and high-impact denture base acrylics.
机译:简介:这项研究评估了义齿基托丙烯酸酯,义齿的组成以及脊搭接表面处理对三种不同市售义齿和两种注射义齿加工系统的微拉伸粘合强度(microTBS)的影响。;材料与方法:十六项实验根据义齿的牙齿表面处理(制造商未建议进行任何处理或表面处理),义齿基托处理技术和丙烯酸树脂(SRIvocap-Ivocap Plus或Success-Lucitone 199)和牙齿的类型组成,分为两组(n = 3)在绑定界面(BlueLine DCL-PMMA,肖像IPN-PMMA,Phonares II-PMMA,Phonares II-NHC)上。制作出横截面面积为1mm2的矩形条形试样,然后在10,000个循环下于5°C至55°C之间进行热循环,停留时间为15秒。选择的样品在具有1 kN称重传感器的通用测试机(Instron)中以0.5 mm / min的十字头速度进行了microTBS测试。通过两次和三次方差分析和Tukey事后检验(alpha = 0.05)对数据进行统计分析;结果:Ivocap Plus标本的平均microTBS介于56.2 +/- 5.6至60.8 +/- 5.0(N / mm2)之间和Lucitone 199标本的13.3 +/- 5.12至60.1 +/- 6.0(N / mm2)。在Ivocap标本中,BlueLine DCL和Phonares II NHC具有比Ivocap Plus丙烯酸肖像IPN高得多的microTBS。 Blueline,Phonares PMMA和Phonares NHC之间,或Phonares PMMA和Portrait IPN之间没有统计学上的显着差异。在Luctione 199标本中,BlueLine DCL和Phonares II NHC假牙的microTBS明显高于制造商建议的表面处理(与对照表面相比)。 BlueLine,Portrait和Phonares PMMA组的平均microTBS明显高于Phonares NHC组。结论:在本实验研究的范围内,研究结果表明,义齿基托材料的类型,义齿的组成和表面处理均会对微拉伸强度产生影响。某些类型的高度交联的义齿与高冲击力义齿基体丙烯酸之间的粘结强度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Colebeck, Amanda.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Buffalo.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Buffalo.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Dentistry.;Biophysics Biomechanics.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 32 p.
  • 总页数 32
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号