首页> 外文学位 >Streitkultur: Polemic and the Problem of Public Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Germany.
【24h】

Streitkultur: Polemic and the Problem of Public Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Germany.

机译:Streitkultur:18世纪德国的论战与公众启蒙问题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My dissertation traces the waning of the Enlightenment in Germany. I examine how a consciously directed attempt to merge the early modern Republic of Letters with the nascent, bourgeois public sphere in order to create a culture of learned public debate was curtailed and ultimately channeled back into an academic forum. In the eyes of its proponents, this culture of public debate, which I term a Streitkultur, carried with it the potential to accelerate the process of popular enlightenment that had until that point in time stagnated in the German speaking territories. I examine controversies such as Gotthold Ephraim Lessing's Fragmentenstreit, the outbreak of theological polemic in the years after Lessing's death, the pantheism controversy between Moses Mendelssohn and Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, and Immanuel Kant's efforts to supersede these controversies via his tribunal of Kritik. Collectively, these debates demonstrate how a specific form of erudite polemical discourse was transformed into a popular, polemical assault on the pillars of state and church authority. The significance of these debates for the development of the public sphere has until now not received thorough critical attention. Complementing recent work that has shed light on the political, theological, and rhetorical contexts of numerous early modern religious controversies and the mostly successful to deny publicity to these disputes, I show that the attempt to establish a robust Streitkultur likewise provoked a counter-reaction that had as its effect the reinstallation of polemic in its original context and the ultimate curtailment of the possibility of public enlightenment.
机译:我的论文追溯了德国启蒙运动的衰落。我研究了如何缩减有意识地将早期的现代莱昂共和国与新兴的资产阶级公共领域合并以创建博学的公共辩论文化的尝试,并最终将其引导回学术论坛。在其拥护者的眼中,这种公共辩论文化(我称之为“ Streitkultur”)具有带动加速民众启蒙进程的潜力,这一进程一直到那时仍在德语地区停滞不前。我研究了诸如Gotthold Ephraim Lessing的Fragmentenstreit之类的争议,在Lessing死后几年爆发的神学论争,Moses Mendelssohn与Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi之间的泛神论争议以及Immanuel Kant试图通过他的Kritik法庭取代这些争议的努力。这些辩论共同表明,博学的辩论性话语的一种特定形式是如何转变为对国家和教会权威支柱的普遍的辩论式攻击。迄今为止,这些辩论对于公共领域发展的意义尚未得到充分的批判关注。我补充了最近的工作,这些工作揭示了许多早期现代宗教争议的政治,神学和修辞背景,并且大多数人都成功地否认了对这些争端的宣传,我证明建立一个强大的Streitkultur的尝试同样引起了反动,其后果是在其原始背景下重新引起了争论,并最终限制了公众启蒙的可能性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fine, Jonathan Blake.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Irvine.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Irvine.;
  • 学科 Literature Germanic.;European Studies.;Religion History of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 288 p.
  • 总页数 288
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号