首页> 外文学位 >The effect of the 'Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal' test preparation program on the critical thinking of teacher education program applicants.
【24h】

The effect of the 'Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal' test preparation program on the critical thinking of teacher education program applicants.

机译:“ Watson-Glaser批判性思维评估”考试准备计划对教师教育计划申请人的批判性思维的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Mandates by the State Board for Educator Certification necessitated that by January 1, 2000, a critical thinking assessment become part of the admission criteria for teacher education programs throughout Texas. In compliance, the School of Education at The University of Texas at Brownsville and Texas Southmost College selected the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal . This decision has had far reaching implications for teacher education program applicants, the School of Education, and the university.; Preliminary analyses of the performance of the teacher education program applicants on the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal revealed that more than forty percent of the applicants did not achieve the minimum required score on the test. In response, the University's Learning Assistance Center's Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Test Preparation Program was designed and implemented. However, since its implementation, the effectiveness of the Program has not been evaluated.; The purpose of this study was to describe the effectiveness of the Test Preparation Program. A causal comparative research design was used to examine the Program's effectiveness. The participants consisted of all applicants who took the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal as part of the admission requirements for the teacher education program in the School of Education at an open-door admission policy university. This study required the collection and systematic analysis of the following archival data: (1) the results of teacher education program applicants' performance on the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal; and (2) the Test Preparation Program's attendance records.; To test the hypothesis that there is a statistically significant difference in the critical thinking of teacher education program applicants who participated in the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Test Preparation Program and the critical thinking of teacher education program applicants who did not participate in the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Test Preparation Program, the data were analyzed using the Pearson chi-square statistical technique. The ninety-five percent confidence level (p .05) was used as the criterion level for determining program effectiveness.; Although the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal pass rate was slightly higher for applicants who participated in the Test Preparation Program, the results of this study indicated that the critical thinking of teacher education program applicants who participated in the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Test Preparation Program was not statistically significantly higher than critical thinking of teacher education program applicants who did not participate in the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Test Preparation Program.
机译:州教育工作者认证委员会的命令要求,到2000年1月1日,批判性思维评估已成为整个德克萨斯州师范教育计划录取标准的一部分。为符合规定,德克萨斯大学布朗斯维尔分校的教育学院和德克萨斯州最南端的学院选择了Watson-Glaser批判性思维评估。这一决定对教师教育计划的申请者,教育学院和大学产生了深远的影响。在Watson-Glaser批判性思维评估中对教师教育计划申请人的表现进行的初步分析显示,超过40%的申请人未达到考试的最低要求分数。为此,设计并实施了大学学习支持中心的“沃森-格拉瑟批判性思维评估考试准备程序”。但是,自计划实施以来,尚未评估该计划的有效性。这项研究的目的是描述测试准备计划的有效性。因果的比较研究设计用于检查该计划的有效性。参加者包括所有参加过Watson-Glaser批判性思维评估的申请者,这些评估是开放式录取政策大学教育学院教师教育计划的录取要求的一部分。这项研究需要收集和系统分析以下档案数据:(1)教师教育计划申请人在沃森-格拉瑟批判性思维评估中的表现结果; (2)考试准备计划的出勤记录。为了检验以下假设的假设,即参与Watson-Glaser批判性思维评估测试准备程序的师范教育计划申请人的批判性思维与未参加Watson-Glaser的师范教育计划申请人的批判性思维有统计学差异Glaser批判性思维评估测试准备程序,使用Pearson卡方统计技术分析数据。 95%的置信度水平(p <.05)被用作确定计划有效性的标准水平。尽管参加考试准备计划的申请人的沃森-格拉瑟批判性思维评估通过率略高,但这项研究的结果表明,参加沃森-格拉斯批判性思维评估测验准备的教师教育计划申请人的批判性思维该计划在统计学上没有明显高于未参加Watson-Glaser批判性思维评估考试准备课程的教师教育计划申请人的批判性思维。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Houston.;

  • 授予单位 University of Houston.;
  • 学科 Education Adult and Continuing.; Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 131 p.
  • 总页数 131
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 成人教育、业余教育;教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号