首页> 外文学位 >Understanding Physicians' and Non-Physician Practitioners' Recommending Practices, Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Expectations Regarding Music as a Cost-Effective Complementary and Alternative Medicine Approach.
【24h】

Understanding Physicians' and Non-Physician Practitioners' Recommending Practices, Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Expectations Regarding Music as a Cost-Effective Complementary and Alternative Medicine Approach.

机译:了解医师和非医师从业者对音乐作为具有成本效益的补充医学和替代医学方法的推荐做法,知识,态度,信念和期望。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background and Purpose of the Study: With the rise in healthcare costs, partly due to an aging demographic (of whom these care-receivers and their informal family member/friend caregivers are experiencing high stress and anxiety levels resulting in an increase in nursing home placement), a need exists for a cost-effective alternative to the traditional medical approach. Specifically, Music Therapy, a form of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) has been shown to decrease the severity of the problem by alleviating symptoms of an illness and improving overall well-being. The purpose of this study was to create a valid tool entitled "The Global Complementary/Alternative and Music Therapy Assessment (GCAMTA)" and then implement this tool in the population in order to help identify and understand the differences between physicians' (MD, DO) and non-physician practitioners' (NP, NA, NM, CNS, PA) recommending practices, perceptions of knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and expectations regarding music as a cost-effective complementary and alternative medicine approach.;Methods: This study utilized a quantitative methodology with a descriptive, exploratory, cross-sectional and correlational research design to measure recommending practices, perceptions of knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and expectations of physicians and non-physician practitioners. A sample of 544 healthcare practitioners across seven fields of medicine participated in this study.;Results: Reliability for the GCAMTA on the whole with all five dependent variable factors combined was excellent (Cronbach's alpha alpha = .94). Individually, for each factor of the GCAMTA, the reliability ranged from good to excellent: Recommending Practices (alpha = .81), Perceptions of Knowledge (alpha =.92), Attitudes (alpha = .81), Beliefs (alpha = .88), Expectations (alpha = .87).;Physicians (MD, DO) were neutral in their recommending practices, perceptions of knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and expectations towards music as a CAM therapy. Non-physician practitioners (NP, NA, NM, CNS, PA) were less conservative than the physicians and, thus, more favorable towards music as a CAM therapy for their patients. As perceptions of knowledge increased for both groups, favorability towards music as a CAM therapy increased as well. Results of the Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) across all five dependent variables were statistically significant (p = .0001) at an alpha level of 0.01.;Conclusion: Educational curricula may be the root of the discrepancy in the views between physicians and non-physician practitioners. Teachings in allopathic approaches may need to include teachings in holistic medicine in order for awareness of CAM such as Music Therapy to be obtained. In addition, further evidence-based research and longitudinal studies are needed for increased acceptance and eventual recommendation of these types of complementary approaches by healthcare practitioners in their practice.
机译:研究的背景和目的:随着医疗保健费用的增加,部分原因是人口老龄化(这些受护理者及其非正式的家庭成员/朋友的照顾者当中,他们正承受着巨大的压力和焦虑,导致养老院的安置增加了) ),因此需要一种经济有效的替代传统医疗方法的方案。特别是,音乐疗法,一种补充和替代医学(CAM)的形式,已显示出可以通过减轻疾病症状和改善整体健康状况来减轻问题的严重性。这项研究的目的是创建一个有效的工具,名为“全球补充/替代和音乐疗法评估(GCAMTA)”,然后在人群中实施该工具,以帮助识别和了解医师之间的差异(医学博士,医学博士)和非医师(NP,NA,NM,CNS,PA)推荐有关音乐作为一种经济有效的补充医学和替代医学方法的实践,知识知觉,态度,信念和期望。具有描述性,探索性,横断面和相关性研究设计的定量方法论,用于测量推荐实践,对知识的认识,态度,信念和对医师和非医师的期望。结果:结合所有五个因变量因素,对GCAMTA的整体可靠性非常好(Cronbach's alpha alpha = .94)。该研究的样本来自七个医学领域的544名医疗保健从业者。单独地,对于GCAMTA的每个因素,其可靠性从好到坏不等:推荐做法(alpha = .81),知识认知(alpha = .92),态度(alpha = .81),信仰(alpha = .88 ),期望值(alpha = .87)。医师(MD,DO)在推荐实践,对知识的看法,态度,信念和对音乐作为CAM治疗的期望方面持中立态度。非医师(NP,NA,NM,CNS,PA)不如医师保守,因此,对音乐作为患者的CAM治疗更为有利。随着两组人对知识的了解增加,作为CAM治疗方法的人们对音乐的喜爱程度也随之提高。所有五个因变量的多元方差分析(MANOVA)结果在α值为0.01时具有统计学显着性(p = .0001);结论:教育课程可能是医师与非医师之间意见分歧的根源。 -医师。同种疗法方法的教学可能需要包括整体医学的教学,以便使人们对CAM(例如音乐疗法)有所了解。此外,需要进一步的循证研究和纵向研究,以提高医疗保健从业者在实践中对这类补充方法的接受程度并最终提出建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Franco, Paul F.;

  • 作者单位

    Seton Hall University.;

  • 授予单位 Seton Hall University.;
  • 学科 Alternative medicine.;Health sciences.;Music.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 240 p.
  • 总页数 240
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号