首页> 外文学位 >Comparison of on-track and not-on-track senior high school students: An assessment of student needs and social characteristics.
【24h】

Comparison of on-track and not-on-track senior high school students: An assessment of student needs and social characteristics.

机译:轨道高中生与非轨道高中生的比较:对学生需求和社会特征的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The student dropout dilemma in the American educational system has remained unchanged for the past 30 years. Dropout figures show more than 6 million high school dropouts living in the United States today. The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze potential dropout variables between two groups of senior students at a local high school.;This study included 228 senior students who were identified within two groups: on-track for graduation and not-on-track for graduation based on state exit exam results. A student questionnaire and student records were used to gather data. The study included descriptive, multivariate, and analysis of variance to determine the relationship of variables between the two groups that may lead to increased probability of students belonging to either group. Findings from the study suggest the following: (1) Not-on-track students desired more assistance from their school in educational development and planning. (2) On-track students had higher mean averages in academic scores. (3) Not-on-track students had fewer mothers, more children, and more adults living in the family home and were less represented in extracurricular activities. (4) Not-on-track students endorsed more negative responses about themselves.;Research suggests that state exit exam requirements for graduation most likely do not cause additional student dropouts; however, research shows that exit exams may be the tipping factor for many students to ultimately drop out. Thus, exit exams can possibly increase student dropouts. The not-on-track students in this study may be at their tipping point. The results from this study show on-track students have fewer dropout factors within their group and higher academic averages than students in the not-on-track group.;The following recommendations are based on the study: (1) Further research should be conducted that uses a student needs' assessment instrument but includes former students who dropped out. (2) A study that concentrates on students' feelings of their school should be conducted at the middle school grade levels. (3) A study comparing responses of students versus responses of teachers could shine light on the school environment.
机译:在过去的30年中,美国教育系统中的学生辍学困境一直没有改变。辍学数据显示,当今生活在美国的高中辍学人数超过600万。这项研究的目的是比较和分析本地高中两组高中生之间的潜在辍学变量。这项研究包括在两组中确定的228名高中生:毕业就读和不就读根据州出口考试成绩进行毕业。使用学生问卷和学生记录来收集数据。该研究包括描述性,多变量和方差分析,以确定两组之间的变量之间的关系,这可能导致增加属于任一组的学生的可能性。研究结果表明:(1)非正常就读的学生要求学校在教育发展和计划方面提供更多的帮助。 (2)在轨学生的平均成绩较高。 (3)未上轨道的学生住在家庭中的母亲更少,孩子更多,成年人更多,参加课外活动的人数也更少。 (4)成绩不理想的学生对自己的反应较差。研究表明,州立大学毕业考试的要求极有可能不会导致学生辍学;但是,研究表明,结业考试可能是许多学生最终辍学的诱因。因此,出国考试可能会增加学生的辍学率。这项研究中未按要求就读的学生可能正处于他们的转折点。这项研究的结果表明,与非轨道班级的学生相比,轨道班级的学生具有更少的辍学因素,平均学术水平更高。;以下是基于研究的建议:(1)应该进行进一步的研究使用学生需求评估工具,但包括退学的前学生。 (2)应在初中阶段进行针对学生对学校的感受的研究。 (3)一项将学生的反应与老师的反应进行比较的研究可能会为学校的环境带来启发。

著录项

  • 作者

    Verstuyft, Lloyd Cyril.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas A&M University.;

  • 授予单位 Texas A&M University.;
  • 学科 Education Sociology of.;Education Administration.;Education Secondary.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 145 p.
  • 总页数 145
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号