首页> 外文学位 >Treatment of MTBE contaminated waters using air stripping and advanced oxidation processes.
【24h】

Treatment of MTBE contaminated waters using air stripping and advanced oxidation processes.

机译:使用空气汽提和高级氧化工艺处理MTBE污染的水。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The widespread use of the fuel oxygenate methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) has led to the contamination of both surface and groundwater supplies. This study evaluates the treatment of MTBE contaminated drinking water using air stripping and advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) on a pilot scale. The treatment efficiency of the air stripper was evaluated at different air/water ratios ranging from 105:1 to 206:1. Although a treatment efficiency of >99% was achieved for each of the air/water ratio studied, the depth of the packing required to achieve this efficiency increased with decreasing air/water ratio. The adsorption studies conducted on MTBE laden off-gas from the air stripper showed that granular activated carbon (GAC) has a higher adsorptive capacity than the carbonaceous polymeric resin. Experiments conducted at different off-gas relative humidity (RH) of 20%, 30% and 50% reveal that the GAC adsorptive capacity decreased with increasing RH, whereas, the RH did not impact the resin adsorptive capacity. Ozone/hydrogen peroxide (O3/H2 O2), ozone/UV (O3/UV), hydrogen peroxide/UV (H 2O2/UV), and ozone/hydrogen peroxide/UV (O3/H 2O2/UV) are the four AOPs evaluated in this study. An increase in the recycle ratio by 100% resulted in a 5% increase in the treatment efficiency. A treatment effectiveness of 98% was achieved with the use of O3/UV process at an O3 concentration of 5.8 mg/L. The experimental results have shown that the O3/H2O2 process is a slightly more effective (2 to 3% more) treatment process than the O3 /UV process at the same O3 concentrations and a H2O 2:O3 molar ratio of 1.4:1. Increased treatment efficiencies were observed with increasing H2O2:O3 molar ratios, with the optimum ratio for maximum treatment efficiency being 1:1. Non-detectable levels of MTBE were recorded in the O3/H2O 2/UV process, at an O3 dosage of 5.8 mg/L and a H2O 2:O3 molar ratio of 1.4:1. The O3/H2O 2/UV process was more effective than the O3/H2O 2 process at lower H2O2:O3 molar ratios and at ratios above 1:1, the difference in the treatment efficiencies was negligible. Tert-butyl formate, tert-butyl alcohol, methyl acetate and acetone were the major oxidation by-products identified in all the AOPs. The conducted cost analyses revealed that air stripping was the most cost effective treatment process compared to the AOPs.
机译:含氧燃料的甲基叔丁基醚(MTBE)的广泛使用已导致地表水和地下水的污染。这项研究在中试规模上评估了通过空气汽提和高级氧化工艺(AOP)处理MTBE污染的饮用水的方法。在从105:1至206:1的不同的空气/水比率下评估了空气汽提器的处理效率。尽管对于每种研究的空气/水比,处理效率均达到> 99%,但为实现该效率所需的填料深度随空气/水比的降低而增加。对来自空气汽提塔的载有MTBE的废气进行的吸附研究表明,颗粒状活性炭(GAC)的吸附能力高于含碳聚合物树脂。在20%,30%和50%的不同废气相对湿度(RH)下进行的实验表明,GAC的吸附能力随RH的增加而降低,而RH不会影响树脂的吸附能力。臭氧/过氧化氢(O3 / H2 O2),臭氧/紫外线(O3 / UV),过氧化氢/紫外线(H 2O2 / UV)和臭氧/过氧化氢/紫外线(O3 / H 2O2 / UV)是四个AOP在这项研究中进行了评估。再循环率提高100%,处理效率提高5%。使用O3 / UV工艺在O3浓度为5.8 mg / L时可达到98%的处理效率。实验结果表明,在相同的O3浓度和H2O:O3摩尔比为1.4:1的情况下,O3 / H2O2工艺比O3 / UV工艺稍微有效(多2%至3%)。随着H2O2:O3摩尔比的增加,观察到处理效率的提高,最大处理效率的最佳比例为1:1。在O3 / H2O 2 / UV工艺中记录到不可检测的MTBE水平,O3剂量为5.8 mg / L,H2O:O3摩尔比为1.4:1。在较低的H2O2:O3摩尔比和大于1:1的比例下,O3 / H2O 2 / UV工艺比O3 / H2O 2工艺更有效,处理效率的差异可以忽略不计。甲酸叔丁酯,叔丁醇,乙酸甲酯和丙酮是所有AOP中确定的主要氧化副产物。进行的成本分析表明,与AOP相比,空气剥离是最经济有效的处理过程。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ramakrishnan, Balaji.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Cincinnati.;

  • 授予单位 University of Cincinnati.;
  • 学科 Engineering Environmental.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 197 p.
  • 总页数 197
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 环境污染及其防治;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号