首页> 外文学位 >Comparative- and Cost-Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Type 1 Diabetes.
【24h】

Comparative- and Cost-Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Type 1 Diabetes.

机译:连续血糖监测1型糖尿病的比较和成本效益。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients are prescribed self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) with insulin injections to reduce hemoglobin A1c and protect against life-threatening complications. In restricted clinical trial populations, evidence shows continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices can reduce A1c further. However, little evidence exists on the use of CGM in clinical practice. The objective was to estimate the adherence, change in A1c, and cost associated with using CGM compared to SMBG alone in a clinical practice setting.;I retrospectively identified 66 adult T1D patients at the University of Colorado Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes who first initiated CGM from 2006 to 2011 and 67 controls using SMBG. 12 months prior to index date was the baseline period with a maximum follow-up of 9-months post index. Adherence and outcomes were assessed from survey recall and medical record data. The short-term change in A1c and costs were projected over a lifetime of CGM use, and costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were reported for both treatment arms.;Baseline mean (SD) age in years for CGM vs. SMBG was 39 (12) vs. 32 (12) (p<0.05); duration of diabetes in years was 23 (12) vs. 15 (10) (p<0.05); A1c was 7.47% vs. 7.67% (p=0.30). N=32 (48%) used CGM < 21 days/month. The between group mean difference in change in A1c, adjusted for demographics, was -0.12% (p = 0.36), whereas the subgroup with a baseline A1c ≥ 7.5% and users of CGM ≥ 21 days/month was -0.49% (p = 0.10). When projected over the long-term, CGM use for the overall cohort and subgroup (CGM use ≥ 21 days/month and A1c ≥ 7.5%) added cost and QALYs when compared to SMBG alone, however the subgroup provided a better value of ;These clinical practice CGM data suggest a trend towards decreasing A1c for adults with T1D, especially in patients with higher baseline A1c and higher CGM adherence. Compared to SMBG alone, CGM provides better value for money when patients are adherent with higher A1c. More data are needed on how to efficiently target CGM therapy in clinical practice.
机译:1型糖尿病(T1D)患者需要通过注射胰岛素自我监测血糖(SMBG),以减少血红蛋白A1c并防止危及生命的并发症。在有限的临床试验人群中,证据显示,连续血糖监测(CGM)设备可以进一步降低A1c。但是,关于在临床实践中使用CGM的证据很少。目的是评估在临床实践中与仅使用SMBG相比,使用CGM的依从性,A1c的变化以及相关费用。我回顾了科罗拉多大学巴巴拉分校戴维斯分校的糖尿病中心首次确诊CGM的66位成人T1D患者。从2006年到2011年使用SMBG的67个控件。索引期之前的12个月是基准期,索引发布后9个月的最大随访时间。依从调查召回和病历数据评估依从性和结果。预计在使用CGM的整个生命周期中A1c和费用的短期变化,并报告了两个治疗组的费用和质量调整生命年(QALYs).; CGM与SMBG的基线平均(SD)年龄年份39(12)vs. 32(12)(p <0.05);几年中糖尿病的持续时间为23(12)vs. 15(10)(p <0.05); A1c为7.47%和7.67%(p = 0.30)。 N = 32(48%)使用的CGM <21天/月。经人口统计学调整后,两组之间A1c变化的平均差异为-0.12%(p = 0.36),基线A1c≥7.5%且CGM≥21天/月的用户为-0.49%(p = 0.10)。从长期来看,与单独的SMBG相比,整个队列和亚组的CGM使用(CGM≥21天/月,A1c≥7.5%)增加了成本和QALY,但是该亚组提供了更好的价值;这些临床实践CGM数据表明,患有T1D的成年人尤其是基线A1c较高且CGM依从性较高的患者,其A1c呈下降趋势。与仅SMBG相比,当患者坚持更高的A1c时,CGM可以提供更高的性价比。在临床实践中,需要更多有关如何有效靶向CGM治疗的数据。

著录项

  • 作者

    McQueen, Robert Brett.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus.;

  • 授予单位 University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Pharmacy.;Economics General.;Health Sciences Epidemiology.;Health Sciences Health Care Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 138 p.
  • 总页数 138
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号