首页> 外文学位 >Differences in multi-degrees-of-freedom coordination of reaching between non-neurologically impaired adults and stroke survivors.
【24h】

Differences in multi-degrees-of-freedom coordination of reaching between non-neurologically impaired adults and stroke survivors.

机译:非神经功能障碍的成年人与中风幸存者之间在达成多自由度协调方面的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The work of this dissertation attempted to further our understanding of multi-degree of freedom coordination of reaching within and beyond a person's functional arm length. With the first two studies of this dissertation, the mechanism of interjoint coordination in reaching was systematically addressed. First, differences in coordination among joints of the arm between young and older adults were related specifically to their potential effect on the consistency of the hand path during reaching to targets. Second, comparisons of interjoint coordination were made between older adults and stroke survivors to identify the extent to which deficits in coordination in stroke survivors are due to aging versus the stroke, and how this differed between right-brain and left-brain strokes.;In line with our prediction for the first study, the elbow and wrist distal joints covaried with other joints to stabilize the hand's path more during the late than the early phase of reaching. In contrast, the shoulder joint's covariation with other joints was similar for both phases of reaching. In addition, the shoulder's coordination with other joints had more of an impact on hand path variability than did either the elbow's or the wrist's coordination with the other joints. Young adults exhibited better interjoint coordination, evidenced by a larger increase in "bad" variance after simulated removal of joint covariation than older adults. Also, interjoint coordination was better for the right than the left arm for young but not for older adults, but this was the case only for the late phase of the reach and moreover for distal joints only. Thus, the results from the first study indicated age-related changes in joints' coordination related to the consistency of the hand path during reaching. In the second study, simulated removal of a joints' covariation led to less change in the magnitude of "bad" variance for the paretic arm as compared to the comparable arm of the controls, confirming poorer coordination of joints of the paretic arm irrespective of the lesion side.;The third study of this dissertation investigated differences in muscle synergies of the trunk in relation to its control during reaching beyond functional arm length between stroke survivors and age-matched control subjects. Many functional reaching activities that involve the arm also require the control of varying degrees of trunk excursion, depending on the distance to be reached. Post-stroke survivors struggle more with tasks that involve reaching upwards, typically requiring lower-trunk initiated movements, including anterior pelvic tilt, compared to downward reaches initiated primarily from the upper-trunk. The former movements have remained largely uninvestigated in stroke survivors. Therefore, the third study of this dissertation addressed this gap in knowledge about differences between reaches to different heights by investigating the coordination of trunk muscles when reaching upward or downward to targets located beyond the subjects' functional arm length for stroke survivors and healthy control subjects. Principal component analysis was used to identify combinations of ten trunk muscles, or muscle mode vectors. Flexibility in coordinating these muscle-modes to stabilize the trunk's motion was investigated using uncontrolled manifold analysis (UCM). It was hypothesized that there would be diminished coordination among muscle modes in stroke-survivors compared to controls, resulting in a less consistent trunk movement path, especially when reaching upwards.;For control subjects, during both reaching up and reaching down, the muscle mode variance across repetitions of the task was associated more with stable trunk motion, i.e., "good" variance was greater than muscle-mode variance resulting in variable trunk motion, or "bad" variance. In contrast, stroke survivors showed greater "bad" variance and smaller "good" variance than controls, especially when reaching upward. This result suggests a poorer ability of stroke survivors to decouple subspaces of muscle mode space related to trunk motion, which is necessary for variance of muscle mode combinations leading to an inconsistent trunk path to be restricted while variance of those combinations consistent with a flexible muscle synergy, i.e., allowing for "good" variance, is allowed. Moreover, the poorer ability of stroke survivors to reach upward toward a target appears to be related to even poorer muscle mode coordination compared to reaching downward.;This dissertation improves our knowledge about the control of multi DOFs in reaching for both within and beyond functional arm length. The method employed in this dissertation provides novel means to identify underlying mechanisms that account for functional performance differences between neurologically impaired individuals and matched control subjects. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).
机译:本论文的工作试图加深我们对达到人的功能性臂长之内和之外的多自由度协调的理解。通过对本文的前两个研究,系统地探讨了相互联系协调的机制。首先,年轻人和老年人之间的手臂关节之间的协调差异具体与他们在达到目标时对手部路径一致性的潜在影响有关。其次,比较了老年人和中风幸存者之间的关节协调,以确定中风幸存者中的衰老与中风所致协调不足的程度,以及右脑卒中和左脑卒中之间的区别。与我们对第一个研究的预测一致,肘部和腕部远端关节与其他关节协变,以使手部路径在晚期达到稳定的程度比到达早期要稳定得多。相反,在到达的两个阶段,肩关节与其他关节的协变相似。此外,与肘关节或手腕与其他关节的协调相比,肩膀与其他关节的协调对手路径变异性的影响更大。年轻人表现出更好的关节间协调性,这是通过模拟去除关节协变量后,“不良”方差的增加大于成年人而得到的。而且,年轻人的左右关节协调性比年轻人的左臂更好,但老年人则不然,但是这种情况仅在伸手可及的晚期阶段才发生,而且仅在远端关节处如此。因此,第一项研究的结果表明与年龄相关的关节协调变化与伸手过程中手部路径的一致性有关。在第二项研究中,与对照组的可比手臂相比,模拟去除关节的协方差导致仿生手臂的“不良”方差幅度的变化较小,从而证实了仿生手臂的关节协调性较差本论文的第三项研究调查了卒中幸存者与年龄匹配的对照对象在超过功能臂长时躯干的肌肉协同作用与其控制相关的差异。许多涉及手臂的功能性伸张活动还需要根据要到达的距离来控制不同程度的躯干偏移。与主要从上躯干开始的向下伸直相比,卒中后幸存者在涉及向上伸展的任务上更加挣扎,通常需要下躯干发起的运动,包括骨盆前倾。对于中风幸存者,前者的运动仍未进行调查。因此,本论文的第三项研究通过研究躯干肌向上或向下到达中风幸存者和健康对照者的功能臂长以外的目标时躯干肌肉的协调性,从而解决了在达到不同身高差异方面的知识差距。主成分分析用于识别十个躯干肌肉或肌肉模式向量的组合。使用不受控制的歧管分析(UCM)研究了协调这些肌肉模式以稳定躯干运动的灵活性。假设与对照组相比,卒中幸存者的肌肉模式之间的协调性会降低,从而导致躯干运动路径的一致性降低,尤其是向上伸时;对于控制对象,在上下伸手时,肌肉模式重复执行任务的方差与稳定的躯干运动更多相关,即,“好”方差大于导致躯干运动变化的肌肉模式方差,或“不良”方差。相反,中风幸存者表现出比对照组更大的“不良”方差和较小的“良好”方差,尤其是向上伸时。该结果表明,中风幸存者解耦与躯干运动相关的肌肉模式空间子空间的能力较弱,这对于肌肉模式组合的变化导致不一致的躯干路径受到限制而这些组合的变化与灵活的肌肉协同作用相一致是必要的即允许“良好”的变化。此外,卒中幸存者向上达到目标的能力较差,而与向下到达相比似乎与更差的肌肉模式协调性有关。本论文提高了我们对控制多个自由度以达到功能臂内外的知识。长度。本文所采用的方法提供了新颖的方法来鉴定潜在机制,这些机制解释了神经功能受损的个体与匹配的对照对象之间的功能表现差异。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dutta, Geetanjali Gera.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Delaware.;

  • 授予单位 University of Delaware.;
  • 学科 Behavioral psychology.;Biomechanics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 207 p.
  • 总页数 207
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号