首页> 外文学位 >Myths in European integration: Resolving the crises in the European Community from empty chair crisis to ratification crisis.
【24h】

Myths in European integration: Resolving the crises in the European Community from empty chair crisis to ratification crisis.

机译:欧洲一体化的神话:解决欧洲共同体从空椅子危机到批准危机的危机。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A central theme of this study is to explore a question of why the periodic crises in the process of European integration get constructively resolved. This study argues that "European myths" matter in that European myths are prominent sources that regulate the crises. European myths directly, indirectly and mainly influence the constructive crisis resolution in the EC/EU. To test this hypothesis is presented in three main sections. The first provides general systems theory as an analytical framework and the development of European integration theory. The second seeks to show that to identify the regulatory mechanisms functioning in the process of European integration, two theories such as realism/neorealism and constructivism emerge particularly relevant. It is argued that rational calculation argument alone that is based on realism/neorealism is an insufficient explanation for the constructive crisis resolution. The final main section seeks to demonstrate that the periodic crises in European integration, as the constructivists argue, have been constructively and successfully settled down by the European myths including the myth of European unity and the myth of Franco-German entente. This study views European myths as publicly held beliefs cementing Europeans leaders, comforting them by alleviating uncertainties, and leading them to resolving the crises, especially that associated with traumatic historical experiences and dark tragedies in the First World War and the Second World War. Thus it is argued that European myths are a major foundation of regulatory mechanisms because those influence the constructive crisis resolution, cement community, and build consensus by eliminating all choices expect the choice to move European integration forward.; This study concludes that (1) myths-based argument is not an alternative to the rational calculation argument, but rather an addition to it; (2) European myths are embedded in a new political culture---a problem-solving culture---of the EC/EU; (3) the regulatory capacity of the EC/EU system has repeatedly turned out to be more than sufficient to handle disturbances from the environment that caused the crises; (4) however, once the European myths weaken, the tensions among EU member states are likely to boost; (5) because the basic contradiction, deep-seated distrust, suspicion, and divergent interests have not been resolved, the future path for the European unity will be likely rocky.
机译:这项研究的中心主题是探讨一个问题,即为什么欧洲一体化进程中的周期性危机能够得到建设性解决。这项研究认为,“欧洲神话”很重要,因为欧洲神话是规范危机的重要来源。欧洲神话直接,间接和主要影响欧共体/欧盟的建设性危机解决。为了检验该假设,主要分为三个部分。第一个提供通用系统理论作为分析框架,并提供了欧洲一体化理论的发展。第二个尝试表明,为了确定在欧洲一体化过程中发挥作用的监管机制,现实主义/神经主义和建构主义等两种理论显得尤为重要。有人认为,仅基于现实主义/神经主义的理性计算论据不足以解释建设性危机。最后的主要部分试图证明,正如建构主义者所论证的那样,欧洲一体化中的周期性危机已经被包括欧洲统一神话和德法协约神话在内的欧洲神话建设性地成功地解决了。这项研究将欧洲神话视为公开的信念,巩固了欧洲领导人的地位,通过减轻不确定性来安慰他们,并引导他们解决危机,尤其是与第一次世界大战和第二次世界大战中历史悠久的历史悲剧和黑暗悲剧有关的危机。因此,有人认为欧洲神话是监管机制的主要基础,因为这些神话影响着建设性的危机解决方案,巩固了整个社会,并通过消除所有选择而建立了共识,期望这种选择能够推动欧洲一体化进程。这项研究得出的结论是:(1)基于神话的论证不是理性计算论证的替代,而是对它的补充; (2)欧洲神话融入了EC / EU的新政治文化-解决问题的文化-; (3)欧共体/欧盟体系的监管能力反复被证明足以应付造成危机的环境干扰; (4)然而,一旦欧洲神话减弱,欧盟成员国之间的紧张关系可能会加剧; (5)由于基本矛盾,根深蒂固的不信任,怀疑和利益分歧尚未得到解决,欧洲统一的未来之路将很艰难。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jo, Sam-Sang.;

  • 作者单位

    University of South Carolina.;

  • 授予单位 University of South Carolina.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 252 p.
  • 总页数 252
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号