首页> 外文学位 >An Investigation of the Factors Leading to Invasion Success of Non-Native Plants Using a System of Native, Introduced Non-Invasive, and Invasive Eugenia Congeners in Florida.
【24h】

An Investigation of the Factors Leading to Invasion Success of Non-Native Plants Using a System of Native, Introduced Non-Invasive, and Invasive Eugenia Congeners in Florida.

机译:使用佛罗里达州的原生,引进非入侵和入侵Eugenia同系物系统调查导致非本土植物入侵成功的因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The overwhelming majority of plant species introduced into a new range never become invasive. Consequently, identification of factors allowing the small fraction of successful invaders to naturalize, increase in abundance, and displace resident species continues to be a key area of research in invasion biology. Of the considerable number of hypotheses that have been proposed to resolve why some plant species become noxious pests, the enemy release hypothesis (ERH) is one of the most commonly cited. The ERH maintains that invasive plants succeed in a new range because they are no longer regulated by their coevolved natural enemies, and this reduction in enemy pressure imparts a competitive advantage over native species, which continue to be negatively impacted by top-down processes. Alternatively, the ability of invasive plant species to outperform their counterparts, rather than escape from enemies, may be key in conferring invasion success. The importance of preadapted traits and release from natural enemies in successful invasion remains unclear, likely owing to a lack of empirical studies comparing their effects on relative performance and population growth of closely related species that differ in origin and invasiveness. A system of co-occurring native, introduced non-invasive, and invasive Eugenia congeners exists in south Florida, providing an opportunity to address deficiencies in our understanding of plant invasions by investigating the factors leading to invasion success for Eugenia uniflora. This approach is novel because very few studies have simultaneously incorporated both native and introduced non-invasive congeners into tests of these hypotheses, and no others have done so using this system of Eugenia congeners.;The first study in this dissertation tested the ERH using an insect herbivore exclusion experiment in the field to compare the effects of natural enemies on the performance and population growth of Eugenia uniflora and its native congeners. The results showed that E. uniflora sustained more herbivore damage than its native counterparts, and that the effects of herbivores were sufficient to have negative impacts on performance and population growth. In sum, these findings contradict the ERH. Surprisingly, the vast majority of damage to E. uniflora was caused by the recently introduced Sri Lankan weevil (Myllocerus undatus), with which it shares no coevolutionary history. The second study compared seedling performance among native, introduced non-invasive, and invasive Eugenia congeners to determine if the success of E. uniflora can be attributed to superior performance traits. Invasive E. uniflora was found to outperform its native and introduced non-invasive counterparts in a number of seedling traits, including emergence, growth, and survival, in spite of sustaining higher levels of herbivore damage in the field. This result was consistent across years and sites, suggesting that superior performance may be an important factor in invasion success by E. uniflora. The final experiment investigated the role of enemy release on performance of native, introduced non-invasive, and introduced invasive Eugenia seedlings using an insect herbivore exclusion experiment in the field. In this study, the invasive E. uniflora was again found to sustain more damage by foliar herbivores compared to its native and introduced non-invasive counterparts. However, in spite of higher levels of herbivore damage, E. uniflora continued to outperform its congeners in terms of stem growth, and its congeners did not outperform E. uniflora in any attribute. Insect herbivores negatively affected survival of all species, but were found to have little effect on growth. In combination, the results of these studies indicate that the ability of E. uniflora to outperform its native and introduced congeners at the seedling stage, and not release from insect herbivores, may contribute to its success as an invader. Additionally, E. uniflora exhibits relatively low resistance to herbivory in the new range, and instead may possess an ability to tolerate moderate levels of damage. The implications of this study are that enemy release may not be important in determining invasion success in some systems, and that the accumulation of new enemies may mitigate the effects of invasive plants over time. The paucity of studies investigating interactions among invasive plants and herbivores that share no coevolutionary history warrants further research. Finally, this system of Eugenia congeners provides valuable opportunities to test additional hypotheses and to further explore factors leading to invasion success.
机译:引入新范围的绝大多数植物物种从未入侵。因此,确定允许成功入侵者的小部分归化,增加种群数量并取代常驻物种的因素仍然是入侵生物学研究的关键领域。在为解决某些植物物种成为有害有害生物的原因而提出的大量假设中,敌人释放假设(ERH)是最常被引用的假设之一。 ERH认为,由于入侵植物不再受其共同进化的天敌调控,因此入侵植物取得了新的成功,而敌对压力的这种降低赋予了其相对于本土物种的竞争优势,而本土物种继续受到自上而下的负面影响。或者,入侵植物物种胜过其同伴而不是逃脱敌人的能力可能是赋予入侵成功的关键。在成功入侵中,预先适应性状和从天敌释放的重要性仍然不清楚,这可能是由于缺乏实证研究,无法比较它们对起源和入侵性不同的密切相关物种的相对性能和种群增长的影响。佛罗里达州南部存在一个同时存在的原生,引入的非侵入性和侵入性紫杉属同源系统,通过调查导致紫锥菊入侵成功的因素,为解决我们对植物入侵的理解提供了机会。这种方法之所以新颖,是因为很少有研究同时将天然和非侵入性同源物纳入这些假设的检验中,而没有其他人使用这种Eugenia同源物系统进行过这项研究。昆虫草食动物排他性实验,以比较天敌对单叶紫丁香及其原生同类物的性能和种群生长的影响。结果表明,独生大肠埃希氏菌比其天然同类植物遭受更多的食草动物损害,并且食草动物的影响足以对性能和种群增长产生负面影响。总之,这些发现与ERH相矛盾。出人意料的是,对独角大肠埃希菌的大部分破坏是由最近引入的斯里兰卡象鼻虫(Myllocerus undatus)造成的,它与之没有共同进化的历史。第二项研究比较了本地,已引入的非侵入性和侵入性Eugenia同属植物的幼苗性能,以确定单花大肠杆菌的成功是否可以归因于优异的性能特征。尽管野外对草食性动物的危害程度较高,但发现其在许多幼苗特征(包括出苗,生长和存活)方面均优于入侵性独生大肠埃希菌。该结果在多年和不同地点均保持一致,表明优异的性能可能是单花大肠杆菌入侵成功的重要因素。最终实验使用昆虫食草动物排斥实验,研究了敌人释放对天然,引入的非侵入式和引入的侵染性番木瓜幼苗性能的影响。在这项研究中,与天然和引入的非侵入性对等体相比,侵入性大肠埃希菌又一次被叶食草动物所破坏。但是,尽管食草动物的危害程度较高,但从茎生长方面来看,单花大肠埃希菌仍胜过同类植物,而在任何特性上它的同类植物均不胜过单花埃希菌。食草动物对所有物种的生存都有负面影响,但发现对生长没有什么影响。综合起来,这些研究的结果表明,在种子期,独花大肠埃希菌的性能优于其天然和引入的同类物,而不是从昆虫食草动物中释放出来,这可能有助于其作为入侵者的成功。另外,在新的范围内,独花大肠埃希菌对草食动物的抵抗力相对较低,相反,它具有耐受中等程度损害的能力。这项研究的意义在于,在确定某些系统的入侵成功率方面,释放敌人可能并不重要,而且随着时间的推移,新敌人的积累可能会减轻入侵植物的影响。很少研究没有共同进化史的入侵植物和草食动物之间的相互作用,因此有待进一步研究。最后,这种Eugenia同系人系统提供了宝贵的机会来检验其他假设,并进一步探索导致入侵成功的因素。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bohl, Kerry R.;

  • 作者单位

    University of South Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of South Florida.;
  • 学科 Biology Ecology.;Biology General.;Biology Botany.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 118 p.
  • 总页数 118
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号