首页> 外文学位 >The self-empowered new master at the workplace: Privatization in Russia and China.
【24h】

The self-empowered new master at the workplace: Privatization in Russia and China.

机译:在工作场所自我授权的新主人:俄罗斯和中国的私有化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the dissertation the author explored how privatization in Russia and China shaped transition from state socialism. In the past two decades, many observers believe that Russia and China have moved along two different tracks in their transitions, and analyses about privatization in the two countries were mainly contributed by economists who focus on ownership change and corporate governance. However, the author found that, in the privatizations of Russia and China, the explanatory power of economics analysis is actually limited, because in both countries ownership structure of privatized firms often does not determine corporate governance. The factors that shape the perceptions of managers and workers on issues like property rights, managerial power, and the position of workers, and what the relationship is between their perceptions on these issues and the choices they made during the privatization process have not been properly explored before.;The author discussed the value orientations of managers and workers, and the interactions between the two groups in Russia and China during privatization, and revealed that outcomes in privatization are shaped by social relations at the workplace, and also by social relations among bureaucrats, SOE managers, and private businessmen. Analyzing the sociopolitical and economic preconditions, guidelines, policy making ramifications, and processes and outcomes of the two privatizations, the author found that, although paths of the two privatizations are quite different, in both countries nomenklatura privatization prevailed. Former SOE managers personally invested only a little money, or nothing, have finally empowered themselves to be the new masters of the firms. In Russia and China, the nomenklatura privatization produced similar authoritarian management-worker relations at the workplace, which undermine performance of the privatized firms. Ultimately, Russia's economic transition has moved ahead without the real social reconstruction that occurred in Central Europe, with the result of a backsliding into a capitalist nomenklatura-authoritarian rule, and China's economic transition produces a unique communist capitalism, a new capitalism manipulated by the communist party, a first to be observed in world history.
机译:在本文中,作者探讨了俄罗斯和中国的私有化如何影响国家社会主义的转型。在过去的二十年中,许多观察家认为,俄罗斯和中国在过渡过程中走了两条不同的道路,而对两国私有化的分析主要由关注所有权变更和公司治理的经济学家做出。但是,作者发现,在俄罗斯和中国的私有化中,经济学分析的解释力实际上是有限的,因为在这两个国家中,私有化公司的所有权结构通常并不决定公司治理。尚未正确探究塑造管理者和工人对诸如产权,管理权和工人地位等问题的看法的因素,以及他们对这些问题的看法与私有化过程中做出的选择之间的关系是什么作者讨论了经理和工人的价值取向,以及私有化过程中俄罗斯和中国这两个群体之间的互动,并揭示了私有化的结果是由工作场所的社会关系以及官僚之间的社会关系所决定的。 ,国有企业经理和私人商人。通过分析两个私有化的社会政治和经济前提,指导方针,政策制定分支以及过程和结果,作者发现,尽管两个私有化的路径大不相同,但在两个国家中, nomenklatura 私有化都是普遍的。以前的国有企业经理个人只投入了很少的钱,甚至没有进行任何投资,最终使自己成为了公司的新主人。在俄罗斯和中国, nomenklatura 私有化在工作场所产生了类似的独裁管理者与工人的关系,这损害了私有化公司的业绩。最终,俄罗斯的经济转型在没有中欧发生真正的社会重建的情况下取得了进展,其结果是倒退到了资本主义的-威权主义统治下,而中国的经济转型产生了独特的共产主义资本主义,由共产党操纵的新资本主义,这在世界历史上尚属首次。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cheng, Xiaonong.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.;Sociology Organization Theory.;Sociology General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 732 p.
  • 总页数 732
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号