首页> 外文学位 >Time, frequency, and common stock systematic risks.
【24h】

Time, frequency, and common stock systematic risks.

机译:时间,频率和普通股系统风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is comprised of three essays on systematic risk in financial markets. In particular, we focus on how the exposure and compensation for bearing such risk varies both with time and with frequency.;In the first essay, we develop a simple time-dependent factor pricing model. The time-dependent model has a number of implications, which we test empirically. Our contribution is an augmented Fama-MacBeth two-pass procedure which permits time-variation in both the estimated factor loadings in the first pass and in the estimated factor premia in the second pass by utilizing local linear regression. Local linearity induces time-dependence in the model parameters without imposing strong structural assumptions on the model itself. Our model permits a test of the factor pricing model at each point along the sample and further enables us to test at a given point in time whether an investor receives a premium for bearing the risk associated with a factor; by contrast, existing methods only offer such tests over the sampled interval rather than period-by-period. We find generally weak evidence of a factor pricing specification holding period-by-period, but find evidence that investors are generally compensated for bearing market risk, value risk, and momentum risk on a period-by-period basis.;In the second essay, we turn our focus from time to its complement, frequency. An implication of the canonical factor pricing framework is that factor loadings and factor premia are frequency-invariant. Since a large body of financial literature casts doubt on this assumption, our objective is to induce frequency-dependence into the factor pricing framework. Using wavelet analysis together with band spectrum regression, we extend the Fama-MacBeth procedure and allow factor loadings and premia to vary with frequency, which results in a linear decomposition of the typical factor premia into exhaustive and non-overlapping frequency bands. We design and implement a test for the frequency-invariance of the factor loadings and show that a frequency-dependent factor pricing model more capably characterizes the cross-section of expected returns than does its frequency-invariant counterpart. By ignoring differences in factor loadings and premia across the frequency spectrum, we describe how investors can be misled into making suboptimal investment decisions.;In the final essay, we move past the factor pricing paradigm and consider an alternative way of capturing systematic risk using vector autoregression (VAR). The output of an estimated VAR model on portfolio returns can be viewed as a Granger network, which is a directed graph with edges representing Granger causal relationships. Coupling this network-based approach with a methodology introduced in 2006 to extend the standard VAR-based tests of Granger non-causality to the frequency domain permits the formation of frequency-dependent Granger networks. We further discuss how time-dependence can be induced in these tests by invoking local linear modeling, thereby enabling us to form Granger networks that are localized in both time and frequency. By utilizing techniques from applied graph theory and network topology, such networks can be quantified in terms of the intensity of their interconnectivity using the concept of centrality. In highly centralized Granger networks as opposed to decentralized networks, new information tends to take substantially longer to fully incorporate into prices. Hence, in our context, such measures of centrality offer an indirect measurement of the degree to which new information is absorbed by financial markets. Using the returns on ten industry portfolios, we form empirically estimated time- and frequency-localized networks of these common stock portfolios. Plotting measures of the respective networks' connectivities (measured in a variety of ways) against time and frequency, a three-dimensional surface is formed, which we use to assess how this particular dimension of systematic risk evolved during the recent financial crisis.
机译:本文由三篇关于金融市场系统风险的论文组成。特别是,我们关注于承担此类风险的风险和补偿如何随时间和频率而变化。在第一篇文章中,我们开发了一个简单的与时间相关的因素定价模型。时间相关模型具有许多含义,我们将对其进行经验检验。我们的贡献是增强的Fama-MacBeth两遍程序,该过程通过利用局部线性回归,允许第一遍的估计因子负荷和第二遍的估计因子溢价随时间变化。局部线性会引起模型参数的时间依赖性,而不会在模型本身上强加结构假设。我们的模型允许在样本的每个点上测试因子定价模型,并进一步使我们能够在给定的时间点测试投资者是否因承担与因子相关的风险而获得了溢价;相比之下,现有方法仅在采样间隔内而不是逐周期提供此类测试。我们发现一般来说,每个时期持有因子定价规范的证据都很微弱,但有证据表明,投资者通常会在每个时期内因承担市场风险,价值风险和动量风险而得到补偿。 ,我们将重点从时间转向其互补性,频率。规范因素定价框架的一个含义是,因素负荷和因素溢价是频率不变的。由于大量的金融文献都对此假设表示怀疑,因此我们的目标是将频率依赖性引入因素定价框架。使用小波分析和谱带回归,我们扩展了Fama-MacBeth程序,并允许因子负荷和溢价随频率变化,这导致典型因子溢价线性分解为穷举和非重叠频段。我们设计并实施了针对因子加载的频率不变性的测试,结果表明,与频率不变的对应物相比,基于频率的因素定价模型更能表征预期收益的横截面。通过忽略整个频谱中因子负载和溢价的差异,我们描述了如何误导投资者做出次优的投资决策。在最后的文章中,我们超越了因子定价范式,并考虑了使用向量捕获系统风险的另一种方法自回归(VAR)。投资组合回报率的估计VAR模型的输出可以视为Granger网络,这是一个有向图,其边缘表示Granger因果关系。将此基于网络的方法与2006年引入的方法相结合,以将基于VAR的Granger非因果关系标准测试扩展到频域,从而可以形成依赖于频率的Granger网络。我们将进一步讨论如何通过调用局部线性建模在这些测试中引入时间相关性,从而使我们能够形成在时间和频率上都局部化的Granger网络。通过利用来自应用图论和网络拓扑的技术,可以使用中心性概念根据互连性的强度来量化此类网络。与分散网络相比,在高度集中的格兰杰网络中,新信息往往需要花费更长的时间才能完全纳入价格中。因此,在我们的上下文中,这种集中度度量提供了对金融市场吸收新信息的程度的间接度量。利用十个行业投资组合的收益,我们形成了这些普通股投资组合的经验估计的时间和频率局部化网络。绘制针对时间和频率的各个网络的连通性度量(以多种方式度量),形成了一个三维表面,我们可以使用它来评估在最近的金融危机期间系统风险的这一特定维度是如何演变的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pedawi, Aryan.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan State University.;
  • 学科 Finance.;Economic theory.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 161 p.
  • 总页数 161
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号