首页> 外文学位 >Communication through interruption: The dislocated conversation of writing and reading (Franz Kafka, Austria, Jorge Luis Borges, Argentina, Louis-Rene Des Forets, Nathalie Sarraute, Maurice Blanchot, France).
【24h】

Communication through interruption: The dislocated conversation of writing and reading (Franz Kafka, Austria, Jorge Luis Borges, Argentina, Louis-Rene Des Forets, Nathalie Sarraute, Maurice Blanchot, France).

机译:通过中断交流:写作和阅读时的谈话不畅(弗朗兹·卡夫卡,奥地利,豪尔赫·路易斯·博尔赫斯,阿根廷,路易·雷恩·德·福斯,纳塔莉·萨拉特,莫里斯·布兰科特,法国)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Maurice Blanchot employs the concept of interruption to characterize the role of discontinuity in conversation, and in the literary work. For Blanchot, interruption both aids in understanding by allowing for the necessary pauses and intervals that define the boundaries of words and thoughts, and it also disrupts continuity by emphasizing the infinite interval separating the two parts of an exchange---speaker and listener, writer and reader, writing and the origin from which it arises. One of the most important ideas that comes out of this analysis of interruption concerns the distinction of the book and the work. In The Space of Literature , Blanchot writes, "The writer belongs to the work, but what belongs to him is only a book, a mute collection of sterile words, the most insignificant thing in the world" (23). While the writer's task involves a sort of passive listening to the incessant murmur of the infinite work, she or he must in a sense betray the most essential quality of the work---its infinite recession into nothingness---by bringing the work to expression within the material and linguistic confines of the book. In spite of this necessary failure on the part of writing, the book, for the reader, remains the site where she or he may gain a sort of access to the work. Thus, the book becomes a means of impossible exchange between writing and reading---an exchange based upon the interruption of the work's infinite recession. I develop a reading of Blanchot's continual reference to the Orphic myth throughout his work as a way of considering the impossible communication of literature. After a preliminary chapter dedicated to an analysis of the Blanchotian theoretical perspective that informs my dissertation, I focus upon the notion of communication through interruption as a way of reading five short fiction texts. Franz Kafka's "The Burrow," Jorge Luis Borges's "The Garden of Forking Paths," Louis-Rene Des Forets's The Bavard, Nathalie Sarraute's Tropisms, and Blanchot's L'arret de mort all address the supposed outer limits of the text, meditating upon the interrupting function of textual space in regards to the infinite movement of the work. In addition, they focus on the interaction and communication of writing and reading within, and infinitely outside of, the text that serves as their site of exchange. Kafka's narrator obsesses over the outer surroundings of his burrow, which propels him to keep digging, Borges proposes the possibility of unwritten narratives beyond the material space of the text, Des Forets focuses upon the infinite quality of empty chatter, Sarraute "says" as little as possible by bringing attention to the profound "emptiness" of the text itself and the characters within, and Blanchot demonstrates the Orphic circularity of writing and reading as it erases the boundaries which create order and definition in the text. In his or her own unique fashion, each writer meditates upon the limiting factors of textual space and seems to search for a certain blankness which defies containment. This blankness provides the interval within which literary communication functions. When reading these texts through Blanchot's theoretical perspective, we can see the way that these contemporary writers turn away from the concrete, the meaningful, the significant, in favor of a much less secure grounding that defies spatial, temporal, and cognitive limitations.
机译:莫里斯·布兰科特(Maurice Blanchot)使用中断的概念来描述不连续性在谈话和文学作品中的作用。对于Blanchot,中断既可以通过允许定义单词和思想边界的必要的停顿和间隔来帮助理解,也可以通过强调将交流的两个部分(讲话者和听者,作家)分开的无限间隔来破坏连续性。以及读者,写作以及它的起源。从中断的分析中得出的最重要的想法之一是书与作品的区别。 Blanchot在《文学空间》中写道:“作家属于作品,但属于他的只是一本书,一堆无用的单词的无声收藏,是世界上最微不足道的东西”(23)。尽管作家的任务涉及某种程度的被动听取无限作品的不时杂音,但在某种意义上,她或他必须背叛作品的最基本品质-将其无限衰退变成虚无-通过将作品带入在本书的材料和语言范围内进行表达。尽管在写作方面有此必要的失败,但对于读者而言,这本书仍然是她或他获得某种作品访问权限的站点。因此,这本书成为写作和阅读之间不可能交换的一种手段-一种基于对作品无限衰退的中断的交换。我阅读了布兰科特在其著作中对奥菲奇神话的不断提及,以此作为一种思考文学不可能传播的方式。在专为分析布兰科斯的理论观点而准备的第一章为我的论文提供了信息之后,我将重点放在通过中断进行交流的概念上,以阅读五篇短篇小说文本。弗朗兹·卡夫卡(Franz Kafka)的《洞穴》,豪尔赫·路易斯·博尔赫斯(Jorge Luis Borges)的《叉路花园》,路易斯·雷恩·德·佛雷斯(Louis-Rene Des Forets)的《 The Bavard》,纳塔莉·萨劳特(Natalie Sarraute)的《回归主义》和布兰科特的《 L'arret de mort》,都在考虑文本的外部界限,并在文本上进行沉思。关于作品的无限移动的文本空间的中断功能。此外,他们专注于作为交流地点的文本内部和外部无限地进行写作和阅读的互动和交流。卡夫卡的叙述者沉迷于洞穴的周围环境,这促使他继续挖掘。博尔赫斯提出了超出文字材料空间之外的不成文叙事的可能性,德斯·福雷斯专注于空empty不休的无限质量,沙洛特“说”少Blanchot通过尽可能地注意文本本身和其中的字符的深刻“空虚”,而Blanchot消除了在文本中创建顺序和定义的边界,证明了书写和阅读的Orphic圆度。每个作者都以他或她自己独特的方式来思考文本空间的限制因素,并且似乎在寻找某种无法容纳的空白。这种空白为文学传播发挥作用提供了时间间隔。通过Blanchot的理论视角阅读这些文本时,我们可以看到这些当代作家从具体,有意义,重要的角度出发,转而采用了一种缺乏安全性的,可以克服空间,时间和认知局限性的基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    McConnell, Anne C.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Colorado at Boulder.;

  • 授予单位 University of Colorado at Boulder.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.; Language Rhetoric and Composition.; Literature Germanic.; Literature Romance.; Literature Latin American.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 216 p.
  • 总页数 216
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 文学理论;语言学;世界文学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号