首页> 外文学位 >Not a sparrow falls: Divine providence and human suffering (John Mackie, Antony Flew, Alvin Plantinga, John H. Wright).
【24h】

Not a sparrow falls: Divine providence and human suffering (John Mackie, Antony Flew, Alvin Plantinga, John H. Wright).

机译:不是麻雀掉下:神的天意和人类的痛苦(约翰·麦基,安东尼·弗洛,阿尔文·普兰廷加,约翰·H·赖特)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The central question of this dissertation is: how can the Christian doctrine of providence be reconciled with the evil and destructive suffering caused by free creatures? Chapter two argues that such a theoretical reconciliation is both possible and warranted. The theoretical argument attempting to reconcile divine providence and human suffering centers on the eternal plan of providence and the execution of this plan. In terms of the eternal plan of providence, in trying to preserve the divine goodness, the question becomes could God have created a universe of free creatures without the possibility of evil and destructive suffering? A form of this question has been debated extensively for the past forty years in the philosophy of religion. Chapter three critically examines the central figures in this debate; namely, John Mackie, Antony Flew, and Alvin Plantinga. Chapter four argues, drawing upon principles in existential Thomism, that God could not have created a universe of free creatures without the possibility of destructive suffering that is the result of error, moral imperfection, and moral evil.; In light of this capacity of free creatures to fail in their freedom, how are we to understand the eternal plan of providence and the execution of this plan? The work of John H. Wright is employed to treat these questions. Wright shows that scripture does not have a view of God in which God simply executes a plan decided upon in advance; rather, God is an almighty improviser adapting to the actions of creatures such that nothing ultimately obstructs the establishment of the kingdom of God. God can cause the free action of the creature in and through the creature without determining the free creature to one because the creature in her activity is the intentional medium through which the divine will is united to the divine intellect. Through causing the free choice of the creature, God knows the creature's choice and by knowing it God can order it toward the fulfillment of His plan.
机译:本文的中心问题是:基督教的天意教义如何与自由生物所带来的邪恶和破坏性痛苦相调和?第二章认为,这种理论上的和解既有可能也是有根据的。试图调和神圣的天意和人类苦难的理论论点集中在永恒的天意计划和该计划的执行上。就永恒的天意计划而言,在试图维护神圣善良时,问题就变成了上帝是否创造了一个由自由生物组成的宇宙,而没有邪恶和破坏性痛苦的可能性?在过去的四十年中,这一问题的一种形式已经在宗教哲学中进行了广泛的辩论。第三章对本次辩论中的核心人物进行了批判性研究。即John Mackie,Antony Flew和Alvin Plantinga。第四章根据存在的汤姆斯主义的原则提出,如果没有错误,道德缺陷和道德邪恶的破坏性痛苦,上帝就不可能创造出一个自由的生物世界。鉴于自由生物在自由中失败的能力,我们如何理解永恒的天意计划和这一计划的执行? John H. Wright的工作被用来处理这些问题。赖特表明,圣经没有上帝的观点,上帝只是执行预先确定的计划。相反,上帝是一个万能的即兴创作者,可以适应生物的行为,以至于没有任何东西最终阻碍上帝王国的建立。上帝可以使生物在生物中和通过生物的自由行动,而无需将自由生物确定给一个人,因为生物在其活动中是有意的媒介,通过该媒介,神的意志与神的智慧相结合。通过使生物自由选择,上帝知道了生物的选择,并且通过知道生物的选择,上帝可以命令生物实现他的计划。

著录项

  • 作者

    Miller, Richard W.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston College.;

  • 授予单位 Boston College.;
  • 学科 Theology.; Religion Philosophy of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 348 p.
  • 总页数 348
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教;宗教理论、宗教思想;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号