首页> 外文学位 >The evaluation of steady burn warning lights comparing a field experiment, simulator experiment, and repeated-use experiment.
【24h】

The evaluation of steady burn warning lights comparing a field experiment, simulator experiment, and repeated-use experiment.

机译:对比现场实验,模拟器实验和重复使用实验,评估持续燃烧警告灯。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Research was conducted to ascertain the effectiveness of steady burn warning lights on drums with high-intensity sheeting in the work during nighttime hours in terms of work delineation and safety. The research was conducted through a field study and a simulator study. The field study included 14 sites and the simulator study utilized 127 subjects. The measures of performance included crash frequency, mean speed lateral lane placement and location of lane change. Spot speeds were observed at three locations in the work zone. The location of the speed studies were at the beginning of the work zone near the transition area, in the middle of the work zone and at the end of the work zone near the downstream taper. The driving simulator was also utilized to determine the impact of a repeated-use simulator experiment on driver performance. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine if the differences in the measures of effectiveness were statistically significant between sites utilizing drums without steady burn warning lights and sites utilizing drums with steady burn warning lights. In addition, statistical analyses were conducted to determine if the participants of the study performed differently in the simulator, as compared to the field. Research results established that there were no significant difference in traffic operational and safety performance between the drums with and without steady burn warning lights. The findings of this research also indicated partial validity of the use of a driving simulator for human factors research for nighttime driving conditions. The statistical analysis for the repeated-use experiment found that participants exhibited improved speed performance between the first and the second trial; however, continued performance was not evident between the second and fifth trials nor for the other measures of performance of crash frequency, lateral placement or location of lane change. Based upon the findings of the research, it is believe that mean speeds can be used to examine the impacts of various traffic control devices. However, caution should be exercised when attempting to determine the impact during nighttime driving conditions in work zones.
机译:从工作范围和安全性方面进行了研究,以确定夜间夜间工作的高强度薄膜滚筒上的持续燃烧警告灯的有效性。该研究是通过现场研究和模拟器研究进行的。现场研究包括14个地点,模拟器研究涉及127个主题。性能指标包括碰撞频率,平均速度,横向车道位置和换道位置。在工作区域中的三个位置观察到斑点速度。速度算例的位置位于过渡区域附近的工作区域的开始,工作区域的中间以及下游锥度附近的工作区域的末端。驾驶模拟器还用于确定重复使用模拟器实验对驾驶员性能的影响。进行了统计分析,以确定在使用不带持续燃烧警告灯的鼓的站点与使用不带持续燃烧警告灯的鼓的站点之间,有效性度量的差异在统计上是否显着。此外,进行了统计分析,以确定与现场相比,研究参与者在模拟器中的表现是否有所不同。研究结果表明,在有和没有稳定燃烧警告灯的情况下,滚筒之间的交通运营和安全性能没有显着差异。这项研究的发现还表明,对于夜间驾驶条件下的人为因素研究,使用驾驶模拟器具有部分有效性。重复使用实验的统计分析发现,参与者在第一次和第二次试验之间表现出了更高的速度表现;然而,在第二次和第五次试验之间,以及在碰撞频率,侧向放置或换道位置的其他表现测量中,持续表现均不明显。基于研究的结果,相信可以使用平均速度来检查各种交通控制设备的影响。但是,在尝试确定工作区夜间驾驶条件下的影响时应格外小心。

著录项

  • 作者

    McAvoy, Deborah Sue.;

  • 作者单位

    Wayne State University.;

  • 授予单位 Wayne State University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 290 p.
  • 总页数 290
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号