首页> 外文学位 >An analysis of muscle fatigue due to complex tasks and its relation to the strain index.
【24h】

An analysis of muscle fatigue due to complex tasks and its relation to the strain index.

机译:分析复杂任务导致的肌肉疲劳及其与应变指数的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Strain Index was originally designed to analyze mono-task jobs. An experiment using a grip dynamometer was used to simulate six multiple task jobs to study the effect of complex tasks on localized muscle fatigue and to evaluate six different models used to calculate a Complex Strain Index score. These models included average Strain Index score, unadjusted summation, duration adjusted summation, complex equation, minimum intensity, and peak intensity. Two methods of calculating a continuous Strain Index score were also analyzed. Ratings of perceived exertion, hand and forearm fatigue and discomfort, Difficulty Rating, maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), and percent strength loss were recorded for each of the six treatments. Electromyography (EMG) was also recorded for the 24 subjects (12 males and females) who completed the experiment. The EMG signal was analyzed using root mean square (RMS), initial mean power frequency (IMnPF), and slope of the mean power frequency (MnPF).;Each treatment, lasting one hour each, contained a primary exertion (Task 1) of either 10% or 40% MVC for three seconds and a secondary exertion (Task 2) of either 10% or 40% MVC for one or three seconds.;Subjective variables linearly increased (R2 > 0.88) over the duration of the treatments and significantly differed between treatments (p 0.05). Percent strength loss was the only variable with a gender effect (p 0.05). RMS values did not indicate fatigue and were constant over each treatment, but were highly correlated with percent MVC. A significant difference was not found in IMnPF between pre and post treatment values or between treatments (p > 0.05). A significant difference was found for MnPF slope pre and post treatment, but no treatment effect was found (p > 0.05).;The complex equation method of calculating a Strain Index score was the only model of the six evaluated that met all criteria for being an acceptable method of calculating a Complex Strain Index score. The two continuous methods presented for calculating a Strain Index score should not be used for job analysis until further research evaluates their reliability, validity, and critical scores for Hazard Classification.
机译:应变指数最初旨在分析单任务作业。使用握力测功机进行的实验用于模拟六个多任务作业,以研究复杂任务对局部肌肉疲劳的影响,并评估用于计算复杂应变指数得分的六个不同模型。这些模型包括平均应变指数得分,未经调整的总和,经过持续时间的总和,复杂方程式,最小强度和峰强度。还分析了两种计算连续应变指数得分的方法。六种治疗方法中的每一种均记录了感知的劳累,手和前臂疲劳和不适的等级,难度等级,最大自愿收缩(MVC)和力量损失百分比。还记录了完成实验的24位受试者(12位男性和女性)的肌电图(EMG)。使用均方根(RMS),初始平均功率频率(IMnPF)和平均功率频率(MnPF)的斜率对EMG信号进行分析;;每次治疗持续一小时,主要包括以下任务: 10%或40%MVC持续3秒钟,继发(任务2)10%或40%MVC持续1或3秒钟;主观变量在治疗期间线性增加(R2> 0.88),并且显着增加两次治疗之间存在差异(p <0.05)。强度损失百分比是唯一具有性别效应的变量(p <0.05)。 RMS值不表示疲劳,并且在每次治疗中均保持不变,但与MVC百分比高度相关。在治疗前和治疗后之间或治疗之间的IMnPF中未发现显着差异(p> 0.05)。 MnPF斜率在治疗前后有显着差异,但未发现治疗效果(p> 0.05)。六项评估中唯一满足所有标准的模型是计算应变指数得分的复杂方程法。一种计算复杂应变指数得分的可接受方法。除非进一步研究评估它们的可靠性,有效性和危险性分类的关键评分,否则不应使用用于计算应变指数评分的两种连续方法进行工作分析。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stephens, John-Paul.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas A&M University.;

  • 授予单位 Texas A&M University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Occupational Health and Safety.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 118 p.
  • 总页数 118
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号