首页> 外文学位 >The difference space makes: Bergsonian methodology and Madrid's cultural imaginary through literature, film and urban space (Spain, Henri Bergson).
【24h】

The difference space makes: Bergsonian methodology and Madrid's cultural imaginary through literature, film and urban space (Spain, Henri Bergson).

机译:空间的差异在于:柏格森主义的方法论以及马德里通过文学,电影和城市空间(西班牙,亨利·柏格森)的文化想象。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the present effort, the philosopher Henri Bergson's (1859--1941) seminal philosophical work functions as a revitalizing force and even an implicit point of departure for the more urban-oriented critique of Henri Lefebvre's (1901--1991) watershed text L'Produccion de l'espace/The Production of Space (1974). Both Lefebvre and Bergson in fact share a common perception of space---it is neither a static ground, nor an apriori condition of experience as Kant argued, but is instead a process inseparable from time and implicated in thought itself. Grounded in this resulting novel understanding of space, time and difference, I use an interdisciplinary approach to analyze Madrid's cultural imaginary through novels by Belen Gopegui (1992), Pio Baroja (1911) and Luis Martin-Santos (1961); films by Carlos Saura (1996), Alejandro Amenabar (1997), and American Jim Jarmusch (1992); and the urban space of Madrid's Retiro Park.; The purpose of this work is twofold. On the one hand it is an attempt to reconcile the spatial issues of concern to cultural or human geography with an approach to social life grounded in the humanities. On the other it is a call for a deeper understanding of methodology taken in its widest sense. The former seeks not only to introduce spatial questions to the analysis of literature and film but also to articulate the intimate relation of cultural products to the urban processes in which they are formed, interpreted and sold. The latter requires an investigation of the philosophical preconceptions that structure our spatial practice and interpretation, as well as an awareness of the consequences these preconceptions hold---not only for understanding our common world, but also for producing it and finally for the possibility of changing it through action. These twin purposes---bringing geographical concerns into the humanities and assessing the philosophical bases of our spatial production and interpretation---are not so far removed. Through a careful reading of the above key literary, filmic and urban texts from twentieth century Madrid, this work explores the important consequences of conceiving of space as simultaneously mental and physical. In the Bergsonian fashion, these explorations seek to dispense with the stagnant and irreconcilable philosophical tropes of both pure materialism and pure idealism in order to yield a more precise understanding of cultural forms as living processes.
机译:在目前的努力中,哲学家亨利·柏格森(Henri Bergson(1859--1941))的开创性著作为振兴力量,甚至隐含了出发点,对亨利·勒费弗尔(Henri Lefebvre)(1901--1991)分水岭的文字L'更具城市化的批判。 Produccion de l'espace /空间生产(1974年)。实际上,列斐伏尔和柏格森都对空间有共同的认识-正如康德所言,它既不是静止的地面,也不是先验的经验条件,而是与时间分不开的,并且牵涉到思想本身。基于对空间,时间和差异的新颖理解,我使用一种跨学科的方法,通过Belen Gopegui(1992),Pio Baroja(1911)和Luis Martin-Santos(1961)的小说来分析马德里的文化想象。卡洛斯·索拉(1996),亚历杭德罗·阿曼纳巴(1997)和美国人吉姆·贾木许(1992)的电影;马德里的Retiro公园的城市空间。这项工作的目的是双重的。一方面,它试图通过以人文科学为基础的社会生活方法来调和与文化或人文地理有关的空间问题。另一方面,这要求对最广泛的方法学有更深的了解。前者不仅试图将空间问题引入文学和电影的分析中,而且试图阐明文化产品与形成,解释和出售它们的城市过程的密切关系。后者需要对构成我们的空间实践和解释的哲学先入之见进行研究,并且要意识到这些先入之见所产生的后果-不仅是为了理解我们的共同世界,而且是为了创造它并最终为我们创造共同的世界提供可能性。通过行动改变它。到目前为止,还没有消除这两个双重目的-将地理问题纳入人文学科并评估我们的空间生产和解释的哲学基础。通过仔细阅读上述二十世纪马德里的主要文学,电影和城市文本,这项工作探索了同时考虑精神和身体的空间构想的重要后果。这些探索试图以柏格森式的方式摆脱纯粹的唯物主义和纯粹的唯心主义的停滞和不可调和的哲学取向,以便对文化形式作为生活过程产生更精确的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号