首页> 外文学位 >Decline discourse and self -Orientalization in the writings of Al-T&dotbelow;aht&dotbelow;awi, T&dotbelow;aha H&dotbelow;usayn and Ziya Gokalp: A comparative study of modernization in Egypt and Turkey.
【24h】

Decline discourse and self -Orientalization in the writings of Al-T&dotbelow;aht&dotbelow;awi, T&dotbelow;aha H&dotbelow;usayn and Ziya Gokalp: A comparative study of modernization in Egypt and Turkey.

机译:Al-T,Awi,Tha,Sayn和Ziya Gokalp的著作中拒绝话语和自我取向:对埃及和土耳其现代化的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In studies of Islamic civilization, the modes of periodization adopted by previous generations of scholars are generally based on a single paradigm. That is, the modern history of the Middle East starts with Napoleon's expedition' to Egypt in 1798, and the preceding period is considered an age of decline. In other words, the long period of Arab/Islamic civilization lasting from the mid-thirteenth to the early nineteenth century is described as a period of decline and decadence ('as&dotbelow;r al-inhitat) and the period after 1798 as a period of renaissance (nahdah). Virtually every book written on the modern Middle East uses this paradigm as its organizing theme, thus reinforcing its canonical status. A similar decline discourse operates with regard to Ottoman history. A majority of the works on Ottoman history date the beginning of the Ottoman decline (or stagnation) to the second unsuccessful attempt to capture Vienna in 1683. The notion of "the Sick Man of Europe," however, has dominated the perceptions of Europeans about the Ottomans, especially after the mid-nineteenth century. It is this latter notion, the Sick Man of Europe, which parallels the notion of inhit&dotbelow;at&dotbelow; in the Arabic-speaking Middle East. Although these two discourses emerged separately from each other and in different contexts in Europe, they later converge to form one single paradigm through which history of the Middle East has been represented.;The main focus of this study is on the ways in which this discourse is being internalized by native thinkers. This study investigates the process through which intellectuals in Egypt and Turkey internalized the notion of decline, what I call a process of "self-Orientalization." I examine the perceptions of decline and the relevant ramifications in the thought of the Egyptians Rifa'ah Rafi Al-T&dotbelow;ahtawi (known as Rifa'ah Bey) (1801--1873) and T&dotbelow;aha H&dotbelow;usayn (1889--1973), and the Turkish Ziya Gokalp (1874--1924), by focusing on how and why the concept of decline in the pre-modern period of Islamic civilization was justified in their works.
机译:在伊斯兰文明研究中,前几代学者采用的分期模式通常基于单一范式。就是说,中东的现代历史始于拿破仑1798年对埃及的远征,而上一个时期被认为是一个衰落的时代。换句话说,阿拉伯/伊斯兰文明从13世纪中叶一直持续到19世纪初的漫长时期被描述为一个衰落和decade废的时期('as al-inhitat),而1798年之后的时期被描述为一个文艺复兴时期(纳赫达)。几乎每本有关现代中东的著作都将这种范式作为其组织主题,从而加强了其规范地位。关于奥斯曼帝国的历史,也有类似的衰落论述。关于奥斯曼帝国历史的大部分作品都可以追溯到奥斯曼帝国衰败(或停滞)的开始,直到1683年第二次占领维也纳的尝试都没有成功。然而,“欧洲病夫”这一概念主导了欧洲人对奥斯曼帝国,尤其是19世纪中叶以后。正是后者的概念,即欧洲病夫,与inhit˙ low&at; dot; dotlow的概念相类似。在说阿拉伯语的中东地区。尽管这两种话语在欧洲相互独立出现并且在不同的背景下出现,但它们后来汇聚成一个单一的范式来代表中东历史。;本研究的主要重点在于这种话语的方式正在被本土思想家内部化。这项研究调查了埃及和土耳其的知识分子内部化衰退概念的过程,我称之为“自我定向”过程。我考察了埃及人Rifa'ah Rafi Al-T&dotbelow; ahtawi(又称Rifa'ah Bey)(1801--1873)和T&dotbelow; aha H&dotbelow; usayn(1889年- 1973年)和土耳其的Ziya Gokalp(1874--1924年),着重研究在他们的作品中如何以及为什么在前现代伊斯兰文明时代衰落的概念是合理的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kirecci, Mehmet Akif.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Middle Eastern history.;Middle Eastern literature.;Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 295 p.
  • 总页数 295
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号