首页> 外文学位 >A comparative analysis of trading blocs of equal and unequal partners: Does playing with the big guys pay off?
【24h】

A comparative analysis of trading blocs of equal and unequal partners: Does playing with the big guys pay off?

机译:平等和不平等合伙人交易集团的比较分析:和大人物玩游戏能带来回报吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

How does a country's participation in a trading bloc of equal or unequal partners, in terms of GDP/capita, affect its economic growth? Does this effect differ if we look at relatively small or relatively large countries? Are countries in a trading block of equal partners more likely to uniformly grow or does having a large partner help? Are economically powerful countries more likely to draw their partners up the growth scale or use them to advance on that scale themselves? In order to answer these empirical questions I use panel data from 1985 to 2004 on countries that are members of RTAs. I find that membership in trade blocs of unequal partners leads to higher GDP growth rates than membership in trade blocs of equal partners. The results also indicate that large, more developed countries tend to benefit more than developing countries from membership in such agreements.
机译:一个国家以人均GDP /人均参与平等或不平等伙伴贸易集团会如何影响其经济增长?如果我们看一个相对较小或相对较大的国家,这种影响会有所不同吗?处于平等合作伙伴贸易区中的国家是否更有可能统一增长,或者拥有大量合作伙伴会有所帮助吗?具有经济实力的国家是否更有可能吸引其合作伙伴扩大增长规模或利用其自身发展这种规模?为了回答这些经验性问题,我使用了1985年至2004年有关RTAs成员国的面板数据。我发现,不平等伙伴贸易团体中的成员资格比平等伙伴贸易团体中的成员资格导致更高的GDP增长率。结果还表明,大型,较发达国家从这类协定中受益比发展中国家更容易获得收益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rusu, Anca Bogdana.;

  • 作者单位

    Georgetown University.;

  • 授予单位 Georgetown University.;
  • 学科 Economics General.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.;Political Science International Relations.
  • 学位 M.P.P.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 44 p.
  • 总页数 44
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号