首页> 外文学位 >Development of novel analytical techniques to classify physical activity mode using accelerometers.
【24h】

Development of novel analytical techniques to classify physical activity mode using accelerometers.

机译:利用加速度计对体育活动模式进行分类的新型分析技术的发展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Use of accelerometers to assess physical activity (PA) is widespread in public health research, but their utility is often limited by the accuracy of data processing techniques. We hypothesized that more sophisticated approaches to data processing could distinguish between activity types based on accelerometer data, providing a more accurate picture of PA. Using data from MTI Actigraphs worn by 6 subjects during four activities (walking, walking uphill, vacuuming, working at a computer) quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) was performed, and a hidden Markov model (HMM) was "trained" to recognize the activities. The ability of the new analytic techniques to accurately classify PA was assessed. The mean (SE) percentage of time points for which the QDA correctly identified activity mode was 70.9(1.2)%. Computer work was correctly recognized most frequently (mean (SE) percent correct = 100(0.01)%) followed by vacuuming (67.5(1.5)%), uphill walking (58.2(3.5)%), and walking (53.6(3.3)%). The mean (SE) percentage of time points for which the HMM correctly identified activity mode was 80.8(0.9)%. Vacuuming was correctly recognized most frequently (mean (SE) percent correct = 98.8(0.05)%) followed by computer work (97.3(0.7)%), walking (62.6(2.3)%), and uphill walking (62.5(2.3)%). In contrast to a traditional method of data processing that misidentified the intensity level of 100% of the time spent vacuuming and walking uphill, the QDA and HMM approaches correctly estimated the intensity of activity 99% of the time. In a second study, we applied and HMM to data collected on five subjects doing a variety of activities. The HMM was able to correctly classify sitting most frequently (mean(se) percentage of time points correctly identified was 99.2%(0.8%)) followed by walking on declined treadmill (94.2%(4.6%)), jogging (91.6%(5.6%)), walking on level treadmill at 1.25 m·s-1 (90.8%(6.3%)), walking on level treadmill at 1.70 m·s-1 (81.8%(18.2%)), walking on an inclined treadmill (73.1%(16.6%)), vacuuming (58.6%(14.3%)), walking up stairs (50.3%(17.0%)), walking down stairs (43.3%(17.8%)), and a box loading task (27.8%(9.5%)). The novel approach of estimating activity mode, rather than activity level, may allow for more accurate field-based estimates of physical activity using accelerometer data, which would allow for more accurate public health information regarding the relationship between exercise and a variety of chronic diseases.
机译:在公共卫生研究中广泛使用加速度计来评估身体活动(PA),但其效用通常受到数据处理技术准确性的限制。我们假设更复杂的数据处理方法可以基于加速度计数据区分活动类型,从而提供更准确的PA图像。使用来自6名受试者在四项活动(步行,上坡,吸尘,在计算机上工作)中佩戴的MTI人体记录仪的数据,进行二次判别分析(QDA),并对隐马尔可夫模型(HMM)进行了“训练”以识别活动。评估了新分析技术对PA进行准确分类的能力。 QDA正确识别活动模式的时间点的平均(SE)百分比为70.9(1.2)%。正确识别计算机工作的频率最高(平均(SE)百分比正确= 100(0.01)%),其次是吸尘(67.5(1.5)%),上坡步行(58.2(3.5)%)和步行(53.6(3.3)% )。 HMM正确识别活动模式的时间点的平均(SE)百分比为80.8(0.9)%。吸尘最常被正确识别(平均(SE)百分比正确率为98.8(0.05)%),其次是计算机工作(97.3(0.7)%),步行(62.6(2.3)%)和上山步行(62.5(2.3)% )。与传统的数据处理方法错误地确定抽真空和爬山所花费的时间的100%的强度水平相反,QDA和HMM方法正确地估计了99%的时间的活动强度。在第二项研究中,我们将HMM和HMM应用于收集了关于五个主题的各种活动的数据。 HMM能够正确地对坐姿进行最频繁的分类(正确识别的时间点的平均百分比为99.2%(0.8%)),然后在下降的跑步机上行走(94.2%(4.6%)),然后慢跑(91.6%(5.6) %)),在1.25 m·s-1(90.8%(6.3%))的水平跑步机上行走,在1.70 m·s-1(81.8%(18.2%))的水平跑步机上行走, 73.1%(16.6%)),吸尘(58.6%(14.3%)),上楼梯(50.3%(17.0%)),下楼梯(43.3%(17.8%))和装箱任务(27.8%) (9.5%))。估计活动模式而不是活动水平的新颖方法可以允许使用加速度计数据对身体活动进行更准确的基于现场的估计,这将允许有关运动与各种慢性疾病之间关系的更准确的公共卫生信息。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pober, David M.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Massachusetts Amherst.;

  • 授予单位 University of Massachusetts Amherst.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Recreation.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 158 p.
  • 总页数 158
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号