首页> 外文学位 >Interpreting the causes of and policy responses to export booms in developing countries.
【24h】

Interpreting the causes of and policy responses to export booms in developing countries.

机译:解释发展中国家出口激增的原因和对策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The past half century has witnessed an unprecedented rate of world economic development. One stylized fact found by many empirical studies is that most high growth episodes are usually characterized by high export growth. This study addresses some crucial aspects regarding the causes of and policy responses to export booms in developing countries.; The model in Chapter 1 shows that high export growth need not originate in the export sector of the economy. Actually, a rate of export growth in excess of that of GD{lcub} growth may stem from productivity improvement in either the tradable or the nontradable sector. The model also indicates that when TFP is not directly measurable, the real exchange rate can serve as a good indicator to distinguish between episodes of "exports driving growth" and those of "growth driving exports". Evidence from 44 countries over the period 1958-2004 shows that the nontradable sector can play as important a role as the tradable sector in driving episodes in which both GDP and exports grow rapidly.; Chapter 2 studies the policy responses to the export boom that China experienced over the period of its fixed exchange rate regime (1994-2005). It finds no evidence of Chinese government manipulating its currency value from 1994 until 2002. Starting from 2002, however, there is evidence of some degree of sterilization by the Central Bank of China (PBOC). But the great bulk of the large expansion of the monetary base during the fixed exchange rate period is explained as a result of "sterilization by the people", as they vastly increased their holding of real M2 balances.; Chapter 3 evaluates various works that use the macroeconomic balance approach or the Balassa-Samuelson effect approach to estimate China's equilibrium real exchange rate. It then discusses the potential weaknesses of these two approaches with respect to the case of China. It also studies the foreign reserves accumulation in China and finds clear signals of sterilization both by the People's Bank of China starting in 2002 and in the planned issuance by the government of yuan-denominated bonds in 2007.
机译:在过去的半个世纪中,世界经济发展空前。许多经验研究发现,一个典型的事实是,大多数高增长时期通常以高出口增长为特征。这项研究探讨了有关发展中国家出口激增的原因和对策的一些关键方面。第一章中的模型表明,出口的高增长并不一定起源于经济的出口部门。实际上,出口增长率超过GD {lcub}增长率的原因可能来自可贸易或非可贸易部门的生产率提高。该模型还表明,在无法直接测量TFP时,实际汇率可以作为区分“出口拉动增长”和“增长拉动出口”的良好指标。 1958年至2004年期间来自44个国家的证据表明,非贸易部门在推动GDP和出口均快速增长的时期中可以与贸易部门同等重要。第2章研究了中国在固定汇率制度时期(1994-2005年)经历的出口激增的政策应对措施。它没有发现中国政府从1994年到2002年操纵其货币价值的证据。但是,从2002年开始,有证据表明中国中央银行(PBOC)进行了一定程度的对冲。但是,在“固定汇率”时期,货币基础大量扩张的大部分被解释为“人民的绝育”,因为他们大大增加了对实际M2余额的持有。第三章评估了使用宏观经济平衡法或巴拉萨-萨缪尔森效应法估算中国均衡实际汇率的各种著作。然后讨论了这两种方法相对于中国案例的潜在缺点。它还研究了中国的外汇储备积累情况,并从2002年开始的中国人民银行以及政府计划在2007年发行人民币计价债券中发现了明确的对冲信号。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yang, Jie.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 120 p.
  • 总页数 120
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号