首页> 外文学位 >The farm investment and food security implications of privatized land tenure and cash crop production: Evidence for a cooperative tenure alternative for West African states.
【24h】

The farm investment and food security implications of privatized land tenure and cash crop production: Evidence for a cooperative tenure alternative for West African states.

机译:私有化土地使用权和经济作物生产对农业投资和粮食安全的影响:西非国家合作使用其他土地使用权的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In view of the continuing crisis in African agricultural development and particularly food production, and the inefficacy of past policies by African governments and international institutions in improving the investment incentives and productive capacity of low-resource farmers, attention is now being redirected to the institutional context of these farmers, especially the terms on which they own and utilize land. The main debate in this discourse has been about whether or not African indigenous customary land tenure institutions constrain the region's agricultural development and therefore should be replaced with formally privatized tenure systems.; The purpose of this doctoral thesis is to contribute to this debate by explaining and demonstrating how under certain social, political, and institutional governing conditions such customary institutions may evolve into cooperative tenure alternative rather than privatization, promote efficient land use and, in the process, encourage rural farm investments; and by showing that cash crop production, which is linked to land privatization, may impede national food security.; Although previous authors have stressed the need for more inclusive models to address these two research questions, none have provided analyses and evidence that clearly highlighted the linkage between both questions. This dissertation has attempted to accomplish this by demonstrating that farmers operating under a cooperative land tenure system, as facilitated by their social capital and access to state-local institutions, will have less incentive to overexploit any available communal forest land and therefore invest more in intensive farming and agricultural modernization than those producing under a non-cooperative or privatized tenure. The empirical evidence for this conclusion shows that households farming under cooperative systems have a greater average investment spending than those under privatized systems. The dissertation has also shown that cash crops as produced mainly on privatized land and food crops are substitutes in production. On average a percent increase in cash crop production is associated with a 0.18 percent decrease in food crop production for most West African countries.; Thus it may be the case that cash crop production conflicts with the food security needs of these countries, just as it is supported by a land privatization that undermines farmers' investment incentives.
机译:鉴于非洲农业发展,特别是粮食生产的持续危机,以及非洲各国政府和国际机构过去的政策在改善低资源农民的投资激励和生产能力方面效率低下,现在将注意力转移到体制背景上这些农民,尤其是他们拥有和利用土地的条件。在本次讨论中,主要辩论是关于非洲土著习惯性土地所有制制度是否限制该地区的农业发展,因此应以正式私有化的所有权制度代替。本博士论文的目的是通过解释和说明在某些社会,政治和制度管理条件下,这些习惯制度如何演变为合作使用权而不是私有化,促进土地的有效利用,并在此过程中,为辩论做出贡献。鼓励农村农场投资;通过证明与土地私有化有关的经济作物生产可能会阻碍国家粮食安全。尽管先前的作者强调需要采用更具包容性的模型来解决这两个研究问题,但没有人提供分析和证据来明确强调这两个问题之间的联系。本文试图通过证明在合作土地所有制下经营的农民,在其社会资本和进入州地方机构的便利下,将对过度利用任何可用的公共林地的动机较少,因此在集约化投资上投入更多的努力来实现这一目标。农业和农业现代化,而不是非合作或私有化的土地上的生产。这一结论的经验证据表明,合作制下的农户的平均投资支出要大于私有制下的农户。论文还表明,主要在私有化土地上生产的经济作物和粮食作物是生产的替代品。对于大多数西非国家而言,平均经济作物产量的增长百分比与粮食作物产量的下降0.18%有关。因此,经济作物的生产可能与这些国家的粮食安全需求相抵触,正如土地私有化所支持的那样,破坏了农民的投资动机。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tiepoh, Moses Geepu Nah.;

  • 作者单位

    Concordia University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Concordia University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Agriculture General.; Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 214 p.
  • 总页数 214
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农学(农艺学);政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号