首页> 外文学位 >A Comparative Case Study of Online Learning and Bloom's Taxonomy.
【24h】

A Comparative Case Study of Online Learning and Bloom's Taxonomy.

机译:在线学习与Bloom分类法的比较案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Higher education has been under considerable scrutiny for many years. The capabilities of graduates have been the subject of many studies. Science and technology-related classes are content-rich areas involving concepts important for students to understand. In several studies, graduates of higher education have not been able to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the concepts from the classes completed in their degrees.;The Internet has facilitated tremendous changes to education. Many schools are offering a large number of classes and sometimes entire degrees in an online format. With these changes come new challenges in regard to how material is presented to the student and how the objectives of classes are met. In many cases, the instructional design that was employed in a face-to-face class does not work the same way in an online class. Online classes typically need to be designed to meet the objectives of the class and to ensure that a deep understanding of the material is acquired by the students.;The objective of this study is to identify best practices in engaging student learning in online classes, a factor that more traditional methods of assessment may not be well suited to expose. The data were applied to the Taxonomy Table as a means of exploring the instructional methods, student perception of learning, and Bloom's Taxonomy.;This exploratory study utilized qualitative and quantitative data with an elevated emphasis on the case study method. The sample size was three fully-online education programs in technology-related fields. The data was used to identify the characteristics that are thought to support critical thinking in an online learning environment. Multiple sources of data were used to provide a more complete and accurate picture of the context and methods of the online programs included in the study. Data was collected through interviews, documentation, and student surveys. The data was used to develop theories related to the research questions. The learning objectives from the class documentation was used to classify them on the taxonomy table. The study addresses the research questions and emergent themes as well as an in-depth look at the learning objectives of the programs in the study. Practices were identified that are believed to significantly influence the effectiveness of online education in meeting its intended goals. The results related to learning objectives provided insight into what types of student activities best support students in the acquisition of higher order thinking skills. The creation of student projects and the level of specificity in their requirements can be considered as important factors in the support on high order thinking and learning objectives. One of the practices identified as critical to successful online programs is a high level of interaction. The study yielded findings beyond the research question that help complete the picture of what successful online education may entail. The need for more research into specific areas of online education is discussed.
机译:多年来,高等教育一直受到严格审查。毕业生的能力一直是许多研究的主题。与科学和技术相关的课程是内容丰富的领域,涉及对学生来说很重要的概念。在一些研究中,高等教育的毕业生无法从学位课程中证明对课程概念的全面理解。互联网促进了教育的巨大变革。许多学校都以在线形式提供大量课程,有时甚至提供整个学位。这些变化带来了新的挑战,涉及如何向学生展示材料以及如何实现课程目标。在许多情况下,面对面课堂中采用的教学设计在在线课堂中的工作方式不同。在线课程通常需要设计成符合课程目标并确保学生对材料有深刻的理解。本研究的目的是确定使学生参与在线课程学习的最佳实践,较传统的评估方法可能不适合暴露。将该数据应用于分类法表,以探索教学方法,学生的学习观感和Bloom的分类法。本探索性研究利用定性和定量数据,重点放在案例研究方法上。样本数量是技术相关领域的三个全在线教育计划。数据用于识别被认为可以支持在线学习环境中的批判性思维的特征。多种数据来源用于提供研究中所包含的在线程序的背景和方法的更完整和准确的描述。数据是通过访谈,文档和学生调查收集的。数据被用来发展与研究问题有关的理论。来自类别文档的学习目标用于在分类表上对它们进行分类。该研究解决了研究问题和新兴主题,并深入研究了该研究计划的学习目标。已确定实践被认为会极大地影响在线教育在实现其预期目标方面的有效性。与学习目标相关的结果提供了对哪些类型的学生活动最能支持学生学习高阶思维技能的见解。学生项目的创建和其要求的特殊性水平可以被视为支持高级思维和学习目标的重要因素。对成功的在线计划至关重要的实践之一是高水平的互动。该研究产生了超出研究问题的发现,这些发现有助于完整地了解成功的在线教育可能需要做什么。讨论了对在线教育的特定领域进行更多研究的需求。

著录项

  • 作者

    English, Patrick S.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana State University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana State University.;
  • 学科 Educational evaluation.;Educational technology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 223 p.
  • 总页数 223
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号