首页> 外文学位 >The impact of an exit English test on Hong Kong undergraduates: A study investigating the effects of test status on students' test preparation behaviours.
【24h】

The impact of an exit English test on Hong Kong undergraduates: A study investigating the effects of test status on students' test preparation behaviours.

机译:退出英语考试对香港大学生的影响:一项调查考试状态对学生考试准备行为的影响的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The notion that testing exerts influence on teaching and learning is accepted by many. In Hong Kong, some educationalists indeed see tests and examinations as one way of instilling positive changes in learners' learning. In 1993, amidst growing concern that Hong Kong students' standard of English was declining, the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU) proposed to the then University and Polytechnic Grants Committee that a Graduating Students' Language Proficiency Assessment (GSLPA) be devised and introduced to encourage university students to improve their English proficiency.; In 1999, the GSLPA-English was mandated by the PolyU as a university exit English test for its graduates. There was no accompanying formal teaching/learning curriculum, as the test was intended to assess students' level of English proficiency rather than their achievement in some taught English courses. Whilst it was reasonable to expect that some students in this university would engage in some form of learning activities to help them learn/train for their exit English test, it was not clear exactly how these students - of their own accord, without a specified learning syllabus and receiving no input from teachers in the regular English classroom - would approach test preparation.; Hitherto, there has been little research on how washback operates for learners rather than teachers. This study was principally motivated by a desire to better understand learners as participants in the washback cycle. It investigated how a sample of PolyU graduating students perceived the GSLPA-English as a university exit English test, and whether and how they prepared for it. Initially, the study found that this test was perceived by many respondents as lacking in status and stakes, and that not many took steps to prepare for it. The GSLPA-English was superseded by the IELTS-CEPAS in 2002, when the University Grants Committee, in a further attempt to raise students' awareness of the importance of English proficiency, chose to adopt the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) over the GSLPA-English and other English tests as the test of choice for Hong Kong's territory-wide common English proficiency assessment scheme (CEPAS) for university graduates. Insofar as the stated functions of a university exit English test are concerned, i.e. as a tool for assessing students' English proficiency and as a source of motivation to encourage students to improve their English, the GSLPA-English and the IELTS-CEPAS had identical functions. However, as regards test status, these two tests differed significantly from each other in that the former was a locally developed test adopted by a single institution only, whereas the latter was an internationally recognised test implemented territory-wide in Hong Kong and with overt government sanction.; This study took advantage of a timely opportunity to test a washback hypothesis, put forth by Alderson and Hamp-Lyons (1996: 296), which states that the status/stakes of a test will affect the amount and type of washback. The research investigated whether, given the differences in test status described above, perceptions of the exit English test and test preparation behaviours would be similar, or different, between students who sat the GSLPA-English and those who sat the IELTS-CEPAS. The ultimate purpose was to determine the role of test status in mediating washback on learners.; The study investigated and compared the nature and extent of the test preparation activities reported by two samples of PolyU students. The first sample sat the GSLPA-English in its last year of implementation in April 2002, while the second sat the IELTS-CEPAS during its first year in 2002/2003. The data collection method included questionnaire surveys for collecting quantitative data, and semi-structured interviews for obtaining in-depth qualitative data. A final supplementary study was conducted in February/March 2004 to shed further light on some ob
机译:测试对教学产生影响的观点已为许多人所接受。在香港,确实有一些教育家将考试和考试视为灌输学习者积极变化的一种方式。 1993年,由于越来越担心香港学生的英语水平下降,香港理工大学(PolyU)向当时的大学和理工教育资助委员会建议,制定一项即将毕业的学生的语言能力评估(GSLPA),并将其引入鼓励大学生提高英语水平。理大于1999年委托GSLPA-English作为其毕业生的大学毕业英语考试。没有相应的正式教学课程,因为该考试旨在评估学生的英语水平,而不是评估他们在某些英语教学课程中的成绩。可以合理地期望这所大学的一些学生会进行某种形式的学习活动,以帮助他们学习/培训他们的出口英语测试,但不清楚这些学生如何在没有特定学习的情况下自行达成协议。教学大纲,并且在常规英语课堂上没有收到老师的任何意见-将会进行考试准备。迄今为止,关于反洗如何作用于学习者而不是教师的研究很少。这项研究的主要动机是希望能更好地了解作为反洗周期参与者的学习者。它调查了理大毕业生的样本如何将GSLPA-English视为大学的出口英语考试,以及他们是否以及为考试做准备的方式。最初,该研究发现,许多受访者认为该测试缺乏地位和利益,并且没有太多人为该测试做准备。 2002年,IELTS-CEPAS取代了GSLPA-English,当时大学教育资助委员会为进一步提高学生对英语水平重要性的认识,选择采用国际英语测试系统(IELTS)代替英语考试。 GSLPA-英语和其他英语考试是香港全港大学毕业生通用英语水平评估计划(CEPAS)的首选考试。就大学出口英语考试的既定功能而言,即作为评估学生英语水平的工具和鼓励学生提高英语水平的动力来源,GSLPA-English和IELTS-CEPAS具有相同的功能。但是,就考试状态而言,这两项考试彼此之间有很大的不同,前者是仅由单个机构采用的本地开发的考试,而后者是在香港范围内并由政府公开实施的国际认可的考试制裁。;这项研究利用了及时的机会来检验由Alderson和Hamp-Lyons(1996:296)提出的反洗假说,该假说指出,测试的状态/风险会影响反洗的数量和类型。这项研究调查了鉴于上述考试状态的差异,参加GSLPA-英语的学生和参加IELTS-CEPAS的学生之间,对退出英语考试和考试准备行为的看法是相似还是不同。最终目的是确定测试状态在调解学习者反冲中的作用。该研究调查和比较了两个理大学生样本报告的考试准备活动的性质和程度。第一个样本在2002年4月实施的最后一年中使用了GSLPA-English,第二个样本在2002/2003年的第一年中使用了IELTS-CEPAS。数据收集方法包括用于收集定量数据的问卷调查和用于获取深入定性数据的半结构式访谈。 2004年2月/ 3月进行了最终补充研究,以进一步了解某些对象。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Hong Kong Polytechnic University (People's Republic of China).;

  • 授予单位 Hong Kong Polytechnic University (People's Republic of China).;
  • 学科 Education Tests and Measurements.; Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 473 p.
  • 总页数 473
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;高等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号