首页> 外文学位 >Writing ethics: Person, proximity, and responsibility in a first-year composition classroom.
【24h】

Writing ethics: Person, proximity, and responsibility in a first-year composition classroom.

机译:写作道德:一年级作文课堂中的人格,亲和力和责任感。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study investigates the ethical demands embedded in first-year composition pedagogies. The literature on composition courses, teaching, and purposes suggests that student change is an outcome, if not an objective, of composition pedagogics. Yet attention to the ways the pedagogical tasks deployed in these classrooms impacts students is almost non-existent. This study begins to fill this gap by considering the ethical nature of the classroom. By ethical I do not mean a standard of behavior, an ultimate Good, or even a mode of inquiry, but the concrete, continuous recognition of and response to an Other. I conduct both a theoretical and an empirical investigation to examine (1) the ethical demands involved in writing, responding, and arguing, (2) how these demands are taken up by students and to what effect, and (3) what significance these findings have for instructor training and pedagogical development.; To ground my study I conduct a theoretical investigation, which relies on the ethical writings of Mikhail M. Bakhtinand Emmanuel Levinas. These two philosophers view ethics as fundamental to the human condition, bound up with response and language, and enacted in concrete, historical moments. Consequently their work speaks to the unique nature of the composition classroom. I then supplement this theoretical investigation with an empirical one in which I observe a first-year writing classroom at a large, public, Midwestern university. For this empirical study, I collected oral data from classroom interactions as well as written work produced by the students, instructor, and program itself. I conclude that whether the pedagogy is expressivist, rhetorical, or critical literacy-based, it makes serious demands on students because of the very nature of the tasks implemented. These demands complicate any skill acquisition. Responding and writing to/for others involves the student in relationships with Others, perhaps competing Others, which challenge the Self's very existence and expose it to vulnerability, pain, and change. Thus instructors and writing program administrators must consider these demands when determining the tasks and outcomes imposed on students. Moreover, they must recognize their own responsibility to their students and be willing to engage them "without alibi."
机译:这项研究调查了第一年作文教学中所包含的道德要求。有关作文课程,教学和目的的文献表明,学生的改变是作文教学法的结果,即使不是目标。然而,几乎没有人关注这些教室中部署的教学任务对学生的影响方式。通过考虑教室的道德性质,本研究开始填补这一空白。从道德上讲,我不是指行为的标准,最终的善良甚至是询问的方式,而是指对他人的具体,持续的认可和反应。我进行了理论和实证研究,以调查(1)写作,回应和争论所涉及的道德要求,(2)学生如何处理这些要求以及产生什么影响,以及(3)这些发现的重要性进行教师培训和教学发展。为了使我的研究立足,我进行了理论研究,该研究依赖于米哈伊尔·巴赫金(Mikhail M. Bakhtin)和伊曼纽尔·莱维纳斯(Emmanuel Levinas)的伦理著作。这两位哲学家认为伦理是人类状况的基础,与回应和语言联系在一起,并在具体的历史时刻得以体现。因此,他们的作品充分体现了作文教室的独特性。然后,我用一个实证研究作为对理论研究的补充,在实证研究中,我观察了中西部一所大型公立大学的一年级写作教室。在这项实证研究中,我从课堂互动中收集了口头数据,还收集了学生,讲师和程序本身编写的书面作品。我的结论是,无论是基于表现主义,修辞学还是批判性读写能力的教学法,由于所执行任务的本质,它对学生都提出了严峻的要求。这些要求使任何技能学习变得复杂。对他人的回应和写作涉及到学生与他人的关系,也许是与他人竞争的关系,这挑战了自我的存在并使其易受伤害,痛苦和变化。因此,教师和写作程序管理员必须在确定学生的任务和结果时考虑这些要求。此外,他们必须认识到自己对学生的责任,并愿意“毫无根据地”与他们互动。

著录项

  • 作者

    Griffith, Jennifer R.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Language Rhetoric and Composition.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 257 p.
  • 总页数 257
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号