首页> 外文学位 >The effect of spatial autocorrelation on the sampling design for thematic map accuracy assessment.
【24h】

The effect of spatial autocorrelation on the sampling design for thematic map accuracy assessment.

机译:空间自相关对专题图精度评估的抽样设计的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The sampling design, including sampling methods, size, and location, is one of the main concerns in the accuracy assessment of thematic maps. Spatial autocorrelation is an important factor impacting on sampling designs and needs careful consideration in accuracy assessment. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of spatial autocorrelation on sampling designs for accuracy assessment.; In this thesis, four thematic maps (500 X 500 pixels) with combinations of two spatial autocorrelation levels (high and low) and two class proportion differences (90/10 and 60/40) were generated to study the effect of spatial autocorrelation and class proportion on sampling designs. A series of eleven sample sizes (from a minimum of 25 to a maximum of 1296) were simulated using three popular sampling designs, including simple random sampling (SRS), systematic sampling (SYS), and stratified random sampling (StrRS) on the four simulated maps. The conventional error matrix and related measures were calculated for each simulation, and precision of estimating different measures was compared among the three sampling designs.; The simulation study showed that recommending the use of a particular sampling design depends on the spatial autocorrelation level, class proportion difference, and the accuracy index that a given application requires. In general, the class proportion difference has more impact on the performance of different sampling than the spatial autocorrelation on a map. For estimating the accuracy of individual classes, StrRS achieved better precision than SRS and SYS in most cases, especially for estimating the small class. For estimating the overall accuracy, different sampling designs achieved very similar precision. If a better estimate of the kappa coefficient is required, StrRS is recommended on maps with high class proportion difference, while SRS is preferred for maps with low spatial autocorrelation and low class proportion difference.
机译:抽样设计(包括抽样方法,大小和位置)是主题地图准确性评估中的主要问题之一。空间自相关是影响采样设计的重要因素,在准确性评估中需要仔细考虑。这项研究的目的是调查空间自相关对抽样设计的准确性评估的影响。本文生成了四个专题图(500 X 500像素),两个空间自相关水平(高和低)和两个类别比例差异(90/10和60/40)的组合来研究空间自相关和类别的影响抽样设计的比例。使用三种流行的采样设计模拟了11种样本大小(从最小25到最大1296)的一系列,其中包括四个样本的简单随机采样(SRS),系统采样(SYS)和分层随机采样(StrRS)模拟地图。每次模拟都计算了传统的误差矩阵和相关度量,并比较了三种抽样设计中不同度量的估计精度。仿真研究表明,建议使用特定的采样设计取决于空间自相关级别,类比例差异以及给定应用程序所需的精度指标。通常,与地图上的空间自相关相比,类别比例差异对不同采样的性能影响更大。为了估计单个类的准确性,在大多数情况下,StrRS的精度要优于SRS和SYS,尤其是在估计小类的情况下。为了估计总体精度,不同的采样设计获得了非常相似的精度。如果需要更好地估算kappa系数,则建议在类比例差异较大的地图上使用StrRS,而在空间自相关性和类比例差异较小的地图上建议使用SRS。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wei, Hui.;

  • 作者单位

    Queen's University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Queen's University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Physical Geography.
  • 学位 M.Sc.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 113 p.
  • 总页数 113
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然地理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号