首页> 外文学位 >Chemical characterization and quantitative analysis of oxidative DNA damage, induced by free hydroxyl radicals, in tumour tissue by chromatographic and mass spectrometric techniques.
【24h】

Chemical characterization and quantitative analysis of oxidative DNA damage, induced by free hydroxyl radicals, in tumour tissue by chromatographic and mass spectrometric techniques.

机译:通过色谱和质谱技术对肿瘤组织中游离羟基自由基引起的氧化DNA损伤进行化学表征和定量分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Throughout the last two-tree decades, many analytical methods for the measurement of oxidative DNA base damage have been developed. Besides the GC-MS technique, which is reported in a large number of articles, a view other possible techniques were explored for the monitoring of oxidative DNA damage, i.e. capillary electrophoresis with UV- or MS-detection and HPLC-FLUO.;The SIM-GC-MS technique provides not only low LOD, with the LLOQ approximately 1 ng/ml for each of the four modified bases, but also high selectivity by virtue of monitoring a few selected ions that are characteristic of only one analyte in a complex mixture. This unique characteristic of mass spectrometry (SIM, qualifier/quantifier ion monitoring), combined with the precise measurement of retention times by capillary gas chromatography makes unequivocal identification of these compounds possible. Furthermore, the assay exhibits excellent accuracy and reproducibility. Currently, the SIM-GC-MS technique remains the option of choice for the measurement of oxidized DNA bases in tumour DNA, with or without labeled internal standards, but more recently the LC-MS/(MS) technique is becoming increasingly important.;The possibility of capillary electrophoresis for the analysis of 8-OH-A and 8-OH-G in urine and DNA is investigated. Separation of 8-OH-A and 8-OH-G from the unmodified DNA bases is possible by both CZE and MEKC. However, the analysis of 8-OH-A and 8-OH-G in a DNA hydrolysis mixture, which is described with GC-MS, is not feasible because the sample is not "clean" enough. 8-OH-A and 8-OH-G are not resolved from the sample matrix. The same problem is encountered in the analysis of 8-OH-A and 8-OH-G in urine. Isolation of 8-OH-A and 8-OH-G from the sample matrix (DNA hydrolysate and urine) by RP-HPLC is the solution to this problem.;A few applications are reported in which the monitoring of oxidative DNA damage plays an useful tool in fundamental cancer research.;Further optimization and validation of the various chromatographic and enzymatic assays will require extensive and specific inter-laboratory trials (ring tests). This could be achieved through the ESCODD group, or direct cooperation between two or several groups.
机译:在过去的两棵树中,已开发出许多用于测量氧化DNA碱基损伤的分析方法。除了在许多文章中报道的GC-MS技术外,还探索了其他可能的技术来监测氧化性DNA损伤,即通过UV或MS检测和HPLC-FLUO进行毛细管电泳。 -GC-MS技术不仅提供了低LOD,四个修饰碱基的LLOQ约为1 ng / ml,而且还通过监测少数选定的离子提供了高选择性,这些离子是复杂混合物中仅一种分析物的特征。质谱仪的这一独特特征(SIM,定性/定量离子监测)与通过毛细管气相色谱法对保留时间的精确测量相结合,使这些化合物的明确鉴定成为可能。此外,该测定法显示出极好的准确性和可重复性。目前,无论有没有标记的内标,SIM-GC-MS技术仍然是测量肿瘤DNA中氧化DNA碱基的选择的选择,但是最近LC-MS /(MS)技术变得越来越重要。研究了毛细管电泳分析尿液和DNA中的8-OH-A和8-OH-G的可能性。 CZE和MEKC均可将8-OH-A和8-OH-G与未修饰的DNA碱基分离。但是,用GC-MS对DNA水解混合物中的8-OH-A和8-OH-G进行分析是不可行的,因为样品不够“干净”。无法从样品基质中分辨出8-OH-A和8-OH-G。在尿液中的8-OH-A和8-OH-G分析中会遇到相同的问题。 RP-HPLC从样品基质(DNA水解产物和尿液)中分离出8-OH-A和8-OH-G是解决此问题的方法。报道了一些应用,其中监测氧化DNA的损伤在基础癌症研究中非常有用的工具。各种色谱和酶分析的进一步优化和验证将需要进行广泛而具体的实验室间试验(环试验)。这可以通过ESCODD小组或两个或几个小组之间的直接合作来实现。

著录项

  • 作者

    Guetens, Gunther.;

  • 作者单位

    Universiteit Antwerpen (Belgium).;

  • 授予单位 Universiteit Antwerpen (Belgium).;
  • 学科 Chemistry Analytical.;Health Sciences Oncology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 610 p.
  • 总页数 610
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 化学;肿瘤学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号