首页> 外文学位 >Philosophy through the looking glass: On narrative, philosophical self -images, and the nature of philosophy.
【24h】

Philosophy through the looking glass: On narrative, philosophical self -images, and the nature of philosophy.

机译:通过窥镜看哲学:关于叙事,哲学的自我形象和哲学的本质。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

What is philosophy? No question in philosophy is of greater import: not simply because no answer to this question goes uncontested but because at stake are the very standards by which philosophical excellence is to be measured. In answering this question, one specifies what is to count as philosophy's proper aim, methodology, and starting point. At the same time, it is unclear that any general response could satisfactorily answer this speculative question: either empirically irresponsible or another misguided attempt to weave a grand metanarrative of legitimacy, perhaps the question is better understood as a pseudo-question. Nevertheless, what might it mean for someone to philosophize without some sense of methodology, aim in view, or starting point from which to begin? In answering these questions one orients oneself in philosophical space and time: by knowing one's way about in thought and deed one comes to know what one is about.;This dissertation aims at providing a speculative answer to the question "what is philosophy?" by developing a philosophical narratology the functions of which are twofold: providing fundamental orientation and establishing philosophical legitimacy. Defending the claim that philosophy is a tradition of rational inquiry the status of which is always in question, philosophy is seen to hold the promise of rational self-transformation. This promise is attained by the rational orientation of self to world along four axes of intelligibility: the somatic, interpersonal, temporal, and moral axes. A competing set of philosophical self-images is taken as our starting point: understood functionally as a narrator of a philosophical narrative, a philosophical self-image stands as a mimetic appropriation of common life: prefigured by the domain of practical activity, this narrator configures the philosophical tradition anew with the hopes of reconfiguring his or her interlocutors by means of a philosophical catharsis.;Philosophy as a form of self-transformation promises to answer Socrates' question: how is one to live? Competing philosophical narratives offer competing means of selving philosophically: oriented to competing visions of the good and committed to competing sets of virtues, different sorts of people thus come to see themselves as inhabiting different sorts of worlds.
机译:什么是哲学?哲学上的任何问题都没有更重要的意义:不仅仅是因为这个问题的答案无可争议,而且因为衡量哲学卓越性的标准是至关重要的。在回答这个问题时,有人指出了什么才算是哲学的正确目的,方法论和起点。同时,目前尚不清楚任何一般性的回答都可以令人满意地回答这个投机性问题:要么出于经验上的不负责任,要么是另一种试图编织合法性宏大叙事的误导性尝试,也许这个问题可以更好地理解为一个假问题。然而,如果某人没有某种方法论,目标或出发点就进行哲学化意味着什么?在回答这些问题时,人们将自己定位在哲学的空间和时间上:通过了解自己的思想和行为方式,人们知道了什么。;本论文旨在为“什么是哲学?”问题提供一个推测性答案。通过发展哲学叙事学,其功能是双重的:提供基本的方向和建立哲学的合法性。有人辩称哲学是理性探究的传统,而这种哲学的地位一直是个问题,人们认为哲学具有理性自我改造的希望。自我的承诺是沿着四个可理解的轴对世界的自我理性取向来实现的:躯体,人际,时间和道德四个轴。我们以一套相互竞争的哲学自我形象为出发点:从功能上理解为哲学叙事的叙述者,哲学自我形象代表对共同生活的模仿:由实践活动领域预先构筑,该叙述者配置为哲学传统重新出现,希望通过哲学宣泄来重新配置对话者。哲学作为一种自我转化的形式有望回答苏格拉底的问题:一个人如何生活?相互竞争的哲学叙事提供了相互竞争的哲学服务方式:面向善良的竞争观并致力于竞争美德,不同种类的人因此将自己视为生活在不同种类的世界中。

著录项

  • 作者

    Strand, David Michael.;

  • 作者单位

    Emory University.;

  • 授予单位 Emory University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 309 p.
  • 总页数 309
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号