首页> 外文学位 >Assessing problem solving strategy differences within online and face-to-face courses and their relationship to pre-service teachers' competence and confidence for integrating technology into teaching.
【24h】

Assessing problem solving strategy differences within online and face-to-face courses and their relationship to pre-service teachers' competence and confidence for integrating technology into teaching.

机译:评估在线和面对面课程中解决问题的策略差异,以及它们与职前教师将技术整合到教学中的能力和信心的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This quantitative research study identifies the problem solving strategies pre-service teachers use in learning specific technology skills within an educational technology methods class which is offered both online and face to face. It also examines how such strategies differ by the format of this course, and to what extent these strategies and/or course format correlate with the students' expressed level of confidence and competence to integrate technology into their future classroom settings. The study utilizes data extracted from surveys of over 1,500 students who had taken the educational technology methods course via online or face-to-face format during one of nineteen (19) different semesters at Western Michigan University.;Results revealed more than 85% of the students in both the face-to-face and online sections felt, after completing EDT 3470, the technology methods course, believed they are competent to either integrate technology into their teaching or teach technology to others. However, a significant difference was found with more online students feeling they were able to teach others each of the technology skills, while more face-to-face students felt they would integrate those skills into their teaching. Eight-five percent (85%) of both the face-to-face and online students left EDT 3470 with technology confidence. A small difference was found between course formats with face-to-face students slightly more confident than the online students. In reporting overall problem solving skills used while taking the course, students in the face-to-face course either waited for assistance from their instructor or went to a peer for assistance, and online students chose to discover an answer through the trial and error method or through further reading. However, when asked what problem solving skills was used for specific tasks, results reveal the majority students from both formats used the trial and error method. Further investigation revealed the use problem solving skills, especially using the trial and error method, can predict whether a student will feel competent or confident to integrate technology into their curriculum or teach it. Moreover, course format, online or face-to-face can predict whether more students will feel competent or confident after completing the course.
机译:这项定量研究研究确定了职前教师在在线和面对面提供的教育技术方法课程中学习特定技术技能时使用的问题解决策略。它还研究了这种策略在本课程的形式上有何不同,以及这些策略和/或课程形式在多大程度上与学生表达的将技术整合到他们未来的课堂环境中的信心和能力水平相关。这项研究利用的数据来自西密歇根大学十九(19)个不同学期中的一学期,通过在线或面对面形式对1,500多名通过在线或面对面学习教育技术方法课程的学生进行了调查;结果显示,超过85%的学生在完成EDT 3470技术方法课程后,面对面和在线部分的学生都认为他们有能力将技术整合到他们的教学中或向其他人教授技术。但是,发现存在显着差异,更多的在线学生认为他们能够向他人教授每种技术技能,而更多的面对面学生认为他们会将这些技能融入他们的教学中。面对面和在线学生的百分之八十五(85%)对EDT 3470充满了技术信心。在面对面学习的学生比在线学习的学生更有信心的课程形式之间发现了很小的差异。在报告学习本课程时使用的整体解决问题的技能时,面对面课程的学生要么等待老师的帮助,要么去同伴寻求帮助,而在线学生选择通过反复试验的方法来寻找答案。或通过进一步阅读。但是,当被问及用于特定任务的问题解决技能是什么时,结果表明,使用这两种格式的大多数学生都使用试错法。进一步的调查显示,使用解决问题的能力,尤其是使用试错法,可以预测学生是否会感到有能力或有信心将技术整合到他们的课程中或进行教学。此外,在线或面对面的课程形式可以预测更多的学生在完成课程后会感到胜任或自信。

著录项

  • 作者

    Peterson, Sharon L.;

  • 作者单位

    Western Michigan University.;

  • 授予单位 Western Michigan University.;
  • 学科 Education Teacher Training.;Education Higher.;Education Technology of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 170 p.
  • 总页数 170
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号