首页> 外文学位 >Spending on health care: What drives it and does it matter? Three essays on the wealth, health spending and health of nations.
【24h】

Spending on health care: What drives it and does it matter? Three essays on the wealth, health spending and health of nations.

机译:在医疗保健上的支出:是什么驱动了它,这很重要吗?关于国家财富,卫生支出和卫生的三篇文章。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the relationships between wealth, health spending, and health at the country level. The research revisits a set of interrelated questions on which the literature provides conflicting evidence: the first question investigates how much growth in a country's income drives growth in health spending in different country-income groups; the second question is concerned with estimating the effect of donor funding on domestic government health spending; and the third question evaluates the effectiveness of health spending in achieving better country health outcomes. The analyses in this dissertation were conducted using a panel dataset that was especially constructed from multiple sources by the author for the purpose of conducting this study (181 countries for 12 years 1995-2006). Robust econometric methods were used to examine these relationships. This dissertation consists of three papers.;The first paper examines the relationship between growth in a county's income and health spending. To date, international analyses on the strength of the relationship between country-level per capita income and per capita health expenditures have predominantly used developed countries' data. This study expands this work using a panel data set for 181 countries for the 1995-2006 period. The research shows that health care has an income elasticity that qualifies it as a necessity good, which is consistent with results of the most recent studies. Furthermore, the evidence indicates that health care spending is least responsive to changes in income in low-income countries and that government effectiveness has a positive effect on health spending growth in low-income countries. The results suggest that income growth alone is not sufficient to increase the levels of health spending in these countries to desirable levels. The finding that government effectiveness is associated with mobilizing more funds for health highlights the importance of investing in improving governance because of its positive spillover effects.;The second paper poses the question, "How does donor funding affect domestic government health spending?" This is a particularly important question in light of the notable increases in funding from various donors for health over the past several years. The study measures the extent to which donor funding substitutes for---rather than complements---health financing by recipient governments. There is evidence for a strong substitution effect; the proportionate decrease in government spending associated with an increase in donor funding is largest in low-income countries. The results suggest that to meet donor objectives, aid should be structured in a way that better aligns donors' and recipient governments' incentives using innovative approaches such as performance-based aid financing.;The third paper examines the relationship between country health spending and selected health outcomes (infant mortality and child mortality), using data from 133 low and middle-income countries between 1995 and 2006. Unlike much of the previous evidence on aggregate health spending in developing countries, which finds the effect of aggregate health spending to be insignificant after controlling for income, this paper finds that total health spending and government health spending do have a significant effect on reducing infant and child mortality. A 1% increase in per capita total health spending is associated with reductions of 0.33% in infant mortality and 0.38% in child mortality. In addition, the paper finds evidence that good governance increases the effectiveness of health spending, an impact much discussed and seldom empirically explored in the literature. This paper contributes new evidence pointing to the importance of investing in health care services and improving governance for achieving better health outcomes.;This dissertation contributes to an increased understanding of the relationships between wealth, health spending and health outcomes- particularly for developing countries, where evidence is scarce as a result of data unavailability. The study has direct policy implications for improving health outcomes in developing countries through increasing allocations to health sectors, improving governance and restructuring health aid.;The first paper entitled "The income elasticity of health care in developing and developed countries" was revised and resubmitted to Health Economics with referees' requested changes. The second paper entitled "Does funding from donors displace government spending for health in developing countries?" was published in Health Affairs 28, no. 4 (2009): 1045--1055. The third paper entitled "Does spending on health care in developing countries save children?" will be submitted to the journal Social Science and Medicine.
机译:本文考察了国家一级的财富,卫生支出和卫生之间的关系。该研究重新审视了一系列相互关联的问题,文献提供了相互矛盾的证据:第一个问题调查了一个国家的收入增长多少驱动着不同国家收入群体的医疗保健支出的增长。第二个问题是关于估计捐助者资金对国内政府卫生支出的影响;第三个问题评估了卫生支出在实现更好的国家卫生结果方面的有效性。本文的分析是使用面板数据集进行的,该数据集是作者专门从多个来源构建的,目的是进行这项研究(1995年至2006年为181个国家/地区)。稳健的计量经济学方法被用来检验这些关系。本文由三篇论文组成。第一篇论文考察了县级收入的增长与卫生支出之间的关系。迄今为止,国际上对国家水平的人均收入与人均卫生支出之间关系的强度的分析主要使用了发达国家的数据。这项研究使用1995年至2006年期间181个国家的面板数据集扩展了这项工作。研究表明,医疗保健具有收入弹性,可以将其视为必需品,这与最新研究的结果一致。此外,有证据表明,在低收入国家,医疗保健支出对收入变化的反应最少,而且政府有效性对低收入国家的医疗保健支出增长具有积极影响。结果表明,仅收入增长不足以将这些国家的卫生支出水平提高到理想水平。政府效力与为卫生筹集更多资金有关的发现突出表明,由于其积极的溢出效应,投资于改善治理的重要性。第二篇论文提出了一个问题:“捐助者资金如何影响国内政府卫生支出?”鉴于过去几年来各种卫生捐助者的资金显着增加,这是一个特别重要的问题。这项研究衡量了受援国政府在多大程度上用捐助资金替代(而不是补充)卫生资金。有证据表明有很强的替代作用。在低收入国家,与捐助者资金增加相关的政府支出成比例下降是最大的。结果表明,要实现捐助者的目标,就应当采用基于绩效的援助筹资等创新方法,以一种更好地使捐助者和受援国政府的激励措施相一致的方式来组织援助。第三篇论文考察了国家卫生支出与选定的国家之间的关系。卫生成果(婴儿死亡率和儿童死亡率),使用了1995年至2006年间133个低收入和中等收入国家的数据。与以往有关发展中国家卫生总支出的许多证据不同,该研究发现卫生总支出的影响微不足道在控制收入之后,本文发现总医疗支出和政府医疗支出的确对降低婴儿和儿童的死亡率有重大影响。人均卫生总支出增加1%,婴儿死亡率降低0.33%,儿童死亡率降低0.38%。此外,本文发现证据表明,善治可提高卫生支出的有效性,这一影响在文献中已被广泛讨论和很少通过经验进行探讨。本文提供了新的证据,指出了对医疗保健服务进行投资和改善治理以实现更好的健康成果的重要性。本论文有助于增进人们对财富,健康支出与健康成果之间关系的理解,尤其是对于发展中国家而言。由于数据不可用,证据很少。该研究对通过增加对卫生部门的拨款,改善治理和重组卫生援助对改善发展中国家的卫生结果具有直接的政策影响。题为“发展中国家和发达国家的卫生保健收入弹性”的第一篇论文被修订并重新提交给卫生经济学与裁判员要求的变更。第二篇论文的标题是“捐助者的资金会取代发展中国家在卫生方面的政府支出吗?”发表在卫生事务28号。 4(2009):1045--1055。第三篇题为“发展中国家的卫生保健支出是否能挽救儿童?”的论文。将提交给《社会科学与医学》杂志。

著录项

  • 作者

    Farag, Marwa.;

  • 作者单位

    Brandeis University, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management.;

  • 授予单位 Brandeis University, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management.;
  • 学科 Sociology Theory and Methods.;Economics Theory.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.;Health Sciences Health Care Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 117 p.
  • 总页数 117
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 生物医学工程;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号