首页> 外文学位 >Democracy and the critical imagination: Rethinking the political import of dialectical reflection.
【24h】

Democracy and the critical imagination: Rethinking the political import of dialectical reflection.

机译:民主与批判性想象:重新思考辩证性反思的政治意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Motivated by a general interest in how critical reflection operates in American democratic life, this study is concerned with how a particular style or kind of critical orientation might enrich, or be made to enrich, our image of the strong democratic citizen. In recent years, the idea of a critical orientation has emerged most profoundly in certain strands of theoretical work informed by postmodern or poststructuralist thought. Theorists have sought to explore the democratic import of genealogical critique and deconstruction in an effort to open up political space for different or alternative modes of human being and interaction. And while this work certainly enriches our thinking about the interconnections between social criticism and democratic life, questions remain as to how effective these approaches are or can be in political practice, how well they speak to problems facing many ordinary citizens, and how they might be made to better address deficiencies in democratic participation. Drawing on Hegel and Marx broadly, and with specific chapters on Jean-Paul Sartre, Theodor W. Adorno, and the West Indian writer and activist C.L.R. James, this study aims to supplement recent theoretical work by revisiting the generally forgotten language and conceptual resources of modern dialectical reflection. Working from a self-consciously late modern perspective, and emphasizing generally the rhetorical import of modern dialectical thought, I argue that a reconsideration of select dialectical motifs can help theorists attend to some of the psychic and material constraints that often prevent the kinds of democratic outcomes we desire.
机译:出于对批判性反思如何在美国民主生活中发挥作用的普遍兴趣的推动,本研究关注的是一种特定的风格或类型的批判性取向如何丰富或使我们丰富坚强的民主公民的形象。近年来,批判导向的思想在后现代或后结构主义思想所启发的某些理论工作中最深刻地出现了。理论家试图探索家谱批评和解构主义的民主意义,以期为不同或另类的人类互动模式开辟政治空间。尽管这项工作无疑丰富了我们对社会批评与民主生活之间相互联系的思考,但仍然存在以下问题:这些方法在政治实践中的有效性或可否有效,它们如何处理许多普通公民面临的问题以及它们如何成为现实。以更好地解决民主参与方面的不足。广泛借鉴黑格尔和马克思,并在让·保罗·萨特(Jean-Paul Sartre),西奥多·W·阿多尔诺(Theodor W.Adorno)和西印度作家兼激进主义者C.L.R.詹姆斯(James),该研究旨在通过重新审视现代辩证法反思中通常被遗忘的语言和概念资源来补充最新的理论工作。我从一个自觉的后期现代观点出发,并总体上强调了现代辩证思想的修辞学意义,我认为,对精选辩证主题的重新考虑可以帮助理论家解决一些心理和物质上的制约因素,这些制约因素常常阻碍了民主结果的产生。我们渴望。

著录项

  • 作者

    Douglas, Andrew Joel.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Virginia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Virginia.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 165 p.
  • 总页数 165
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号