首页> 外文学位 >The formation of the 'Shi Zi'.
【24h】

The formation of the 'Shi Zi'.

机译:形成“石子”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation I analyze the formation of the Shi Zi, a text ostensibly dated to c.330bce. This formation includes its authorship, intertextuality, and transmission. Consideration of its authorship involves both the traditional notion of a single author creating one "urtext" and the current authorial paradigm of a "polymorphous text" that evolved out of disparate pericopes circulating independently. Its intertextuality explains some of the parallels between the Shi Zi and other early Chinese texts by positing a variety of ways an author may weave existing narrative into his work. Textual transmission always shapes early Chinese texts, but this influence is magnified for texts like the Shi Zi, which were lost and later reconstructed from other texts that quote it. For all these aspects of textual formation, the Shi Zi is an interesting case by which we may consider the several ways in which early Chinese texts were formed.; Chapter One describes the content of the Shi Zi and reviews recent scholarship on it. Chapter Two traces the transmission of the Shi Zi from its earliest attestation, through its probable loss, down to its sixth extant reconstruction in 1812. Chapter Three explains the "polymorphous text" paradigm by constructing a methodological history of "Authentication studies," a sub-field of textual criticism that determines textual authenticity. Chapter Four considers the authenticity of the Shi Zi by examining previous arguments for and against it. Chapter Five examines the theory of intertextuality for explaining some of the many textual parallels that occur among the Shi Zi and other early Chinese masters texts.; By inquiring into the formation of the Shi Zi I hope to accomplish at least two things. First, I want to contribute to a more complex and more accurate conception of authorship and transmission for early Chinese texts in general. Second, I want to support the reintroduction of the Shi Zi into the study of early Chinese intellectual history. Further research on text formation and on other of the many lesser-known masters texts will yield a more detailed picture of the evolution of this kind of text and its relation to the intellectual concerns recorded in them.
机译:在这篇论文中,我分析了《石子》的形成,《石子》表面上可以追溯到公元前330年。这种形式包括其作者身份,互文性和传播方式。考虑其作者身份既涉及单个作者创建一个“文本”的传统观念,也涉及“多形文本”的当前作者范式,该范式是从独立的周期变化而来的。它的互文性通过提出作者可能将现有叙事编织到他的作品中的多种方式,解释了《诗》与其他早期中国文本之间的某些相似之处。文字传播总是塑造早期的中文文本,但是这种影响对于像《石子》这样的文本却被放大了,这些文本丢失了,后来又从引用它的其他文本中重新构造出来。对于文字形成的所有这些方面,《诗》是一个有趣的案例,通过它我们可以考虑早期中文文本形成的几种方式。第一章介绍了《石子》的内容,并回顾了其最新研究成果。第二章追溯了《石子》从最早的证明到可能的损失,一直到1812年的第六次重建的传播。第三章通过构建“认证研究”的方法论历史来解释“多态文本”范式。确定文本真实性的文本批评领域。第四章通过考察之前和之后的论点来考虑《诗》的真实性。第五章探讨互文性理论,以解释《诗》和其他早期中国大师文本之间发生的许多文本相似之处。通过探究《狮子》的形成,我希望至少完成两件事。首先,我想为一般的早期中文文本的作者和传播概念提供一个更复杂,更准确的概念。第二,我想支持将《诗论》重新引入中国早期知识史研究。对文本形成和其他许多鲜为人知的大师文本的进一步研究将更详细地描述这种文本的演变及其与所记录的智力问题的关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fischer, Paul A.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Chicago.;
  • 学科 Literature Asian.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 295 p.
  • 总页数 295
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号