首页> 外文学位 >The 2002 No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), the amended 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Educational Act (IDEA), and promoting the American democratic ideals of equity and access: A critical enquiry based on the work of Michel Foucault and Jean-Francois Lyotard.
【24h】

The 2002 No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), the amended 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Educational Act (IDEA), and promoting the American democratic ideals of equity and access: A critical enquiry based on the work of Michel Foucault and Jean-Francois Lyotard.

机译:2002年《不让任何一个孩子掉队法案》(NCLB),2004年经修订的《残障人士教育法案》(IDEA),并促进了美国公平和准入的民主理想:一项基于米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)和让·弗朗索瓦·利奥塔(Jean-Francois Lyotard)的工作进行的批判性探究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There is a long history relative to the purpose of American public education. Since at least the Founders, in particular Thomas Jefferson, the purpose of public education has been to prepare children to assume the primary political office, that of citizen. The reasoning was that for a democracy to endure, citizens would have to make political judgments relative to both preserving the democracy and furthering democratic ideals including equity and access to the "good life." This educational philosophy took root more firmly during the 19th century with the advancement of the Common School. The twentieth century saw the dramatic expansion of American public education to include women during the first half and minorities, especially African American children, during the later half. By the third quarter of the 20th century attention was given to the education of mentally and physically handicapped children. This study is a Critical Enquiry to determine if the technologies (methods) of implementation and assessment of the 2002 No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) relative to the amended 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Educational Act (IDEA) are consistent with promoting the American democratic ideals of equity and access.;The Critical Enquiry revealed that the although both Acts have noble intents the methods of implementation and assessment seriously contradict the democratic ideals of both equity and access. Given this fundamental contradiction, the study suggests that all educational policies first be scrutinized through a Critical Enquiry before being fully promulgated and implemented.;The method of enquiry was through a deconstructive reading (analysis) of policy discourse of two Federal laws intended to improve the academic achievement of students in public schools: 2002 No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and the 1990 (as amended) Individuals with Disabilities Educational Act (IDEA). The framework for the enquiry consisted of the historical analytics of Michel Foucault and the language games of Jean-François Lyotard.
机译:关于美国公共教育的目的,历史悠久。至少从创始人,特别是托马斯·杰斐逊(Thomas Jefferson)以来,公共教育的目的一直是让孩子做好准备担任主要的政治职务,即公民职务。这样做的理由是,要使民主制度持久下去,公民就必须做出政治决定,既要维护民主制度,又要推进民主理想,包括平等和获得“美好生活”。随着公立学校的发展,这种教育理念在19世纪更加扎根。二十世纪,美国的公共教育迅猛发展,上半期包括妇女,下半期包括少数民族,尤其是非洲裔美国儿童。到20世纪第三季度,人们开始对弱智儿童进行教​​育。这项研究是一项关键性调查,以确定相对于经修订的2004年残障人士教育法(IDEA)而言,2002年实施和评估2002年《不留任何儿童法》(NCLB)的技术(方法)是否与促进美国民主理想相一致批判性调查显示,尽管这两个法案都具有崇高的意图,但实施和评估的方法却严重违背了公平和获取的民主理想。鉴于这种基本矛盾,该研究表明,在全面颁布和实施所有教育政策之前,首先应通过一项关键性研究对其进行审查;该研究方法是通过对两项旨在改善这种情况的联邦法律的政策论述进行解构性的解读(分析)。公立学校学生的学术成就:2002年《禁止残障儿童法案》(NCLB)和1990年(经修订)《残疾人教育法案》(IDEA)。查询框架包括Michel Foucault的历史分析和Jean-FrançoisLyotard的语言游戏。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bethel, Bambi.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Missouri - Saint Louis.;

  • 授予单位 University of Missouri - Saint Louis.;
  • 学科 Education Administration.;Education Special.;Education History of.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 168 p.
  • 总页数 168
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 土壤学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号