首页> 中文学位 >不同年级非英语专业大学生在词汇学习观念和策略方面的对比研究
【6h】

不同年级非英语专业大学生在词汇学习观念和策略方面的对比研究

代理获取

目录

文摘

英文文摘

声明

1.Introduction

2.Literature Review

2.1 Introduction

2.2 Research into Language Learning Strategies

2.2.1 Definition of Learning Strategy

2.2.2 Classification of learning strategies

2.3 Studies on vocabulary learning strategies

2.3.1 Studies on vocabulary learning strategies abroad

2.3.2 Vocabulary learning strategies research in China

2.4 Development of vocabulary knowledge

3.Research Methodology

3.1 Research questions

3.2 Subjects

3.3 Instruments

3.3.1 Questionnaire

3.3.2 Vocabulary proficiency tests

3.3.3 Reliability of the questionnaire

3.4 Data collection and analysis procedures

4.Results

4.1 The overall pattern of vocabulary learning beliefs and strategies

4.1.1 Beliefs of vocabulary learning

4.1.2 Use of vocabulary learning strategies

4.2 Differences in beliefs and strategies adopted by freshmen and sophomores

4.2.1 Diflferences in beliefs

4.2.2 Differences in the use of vocabulary learning strategies

4.3 Differences in beliefs and strategies between good learners and poor learners

4.3.1 Differences in beliefs between the good learners and the poor learners

4.3.2 Differences in strategy use between good learners and poor learners

4.4 Correlation between vocabulary learning beliefs and strategies and vocabulary proficiency test scores

5.Discussions

5.1 Discussion on the overall patterns of vocabulary learning beliefs and strategies adopted by college non-English majors

5.1.1 The belief of memorizing words mechanically and Rote repetition strategy

5.1.2 Inconsistency between the belief of acquiring words in context and contextualization strategy

5.1.3 Inconsistency between the belief of studying and using words and Activation strategy

5.1.4 One of the least-frequently used strategy:Translation

5.1.5 Three most-frequently used strategies:Dictionary use,Note-taking,and Guessing

5.1.6 The least-frequently used metacognitive strategy:Reviewing and testing

5.2 Discussion on the differences in vocabulary learning beliefs and strategies between the freshmen and sophomores

5.2.1 Difference in the belief of memorizing words by rote

5.2.2 Differences in strategy use

5.3 Discussion on the differences in vocabulary learning beliefs and strategies between good learners and poor learners

5.3.1 Difference between the good learners and poor learners

5.3.2 The differences in vocabulary learning beliefs and strategies between the first-year and second-year good learners and poor learners

5.4 Discussion on the correlation between vocabulary learning strategy use and vocabulary proficiency test score

5.4.1 Two strategies negatively correlated with the vocabulary proficiency test scores:Rote repetition and Translation

5.4.2 Metacognitive strategies

5.4.3 Four strategies found the most effective

6 Conclusions

Bibliography

Appendix

Acknowledgements

展开▼

摘要

本文旨在探究中国非英语专业大学生英语词汇学习观念和英语学习策略使用的总体情况,且进一步了解非英语专业大学一年级学生和二年级学生、词汇学习优生和差生、一年级优差生和二年级优差生在英语学习观念和策略使用上是否存在差异,并研究哪些英语学习观念和策略与学生词汇成绩相关。
   本研究对来自咸宁学院10个自然班的400名,即一、二年级各198、202名非英语专业大学生进行定量对比研究。调查采用了笔者根据Gu&Johnson,范琳、王庆华的问卷改编而成的问卷,以及Nation的词汇量测试和词汇产出性知识测试试卷来收集研究数据。在通过社会学统计软件(SPSS)对数据进行分析后,本研究得到如下结果:
   1.非英语专业大学生总体上赞同通过应用和在语境中学习单词的观点,并在词汇学习中采用多种策略:最常用的策略是查字典、记笔记、猜测;经常使用的策略有重复、联想、练习、选择性注意和事先计划;最不常用的策略有活用、翻译、自主学习和复习与检测。与元认知相比,学生使用认知策略更为频繁。
   2.独立样本T检验表明一二年级学生在某些词汇学习观念和策略上存在显著差异,但总体差异并不十分明显,即二者存在许多共同之处。一二年级学生仅在单词要死记硬背的观念和记笔记、翻译两项认知策略上显示出显著性差异。此外标准差显示在观念和策略使用上二年级学生之间的差异较一年级学生之间的差异小。
   3.词汇学习优生与差生在许多方面存在差异。与差生倾向通过死记硬背学习单词的观念不同,优生更认同通过应用和在语境中学习词汇。此外,优生在词汇学习策略的数量和质量方面都要优于差生。一年级优、差生的差异小于二年级优、差生的差异。
   4.皮尔逊相关分析显示:单词要死记硬背的观念与词汇成绩呈负相关,在语境中习得词汇和通过应用学习单词的观念与词汇成绩分别在0.01和0.05的水平上呈显著正相关。所有元认知和认识策略都与词汇成绩呈显著相关,其中重复和翻译策略与词汇成绩在0.05水平上呈显著负相关,活用策略在0.05的水平上与词汇成绩呈显著正相关,其它策略均在0.01的水平上与词汇成绩呈显著正相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号