首页> 外文会议>Wastewater and Biosolids Treatment and Reuse: Bridging Modeling and Experimental Studies 2014 >Liquid waste treatment: can combined biological processes be really effective?
【24h】

Liquid waste treatment: can combined biological processes be really effective?

机译:液体废物处理:联合生物工艺真的有效吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

1. 1st scenario clearly determined as heterogeneous characteristics of liquid wastes are often a limiting factor for biological treatment. OUR and AUR tests demonstrated to be extremely useful for highlighting the possible inhibition of the activated sludge. 2. 2nd scenario highlighted as the synergy amongst UASB and ASP was effective. Even feeding the 100% of UASB effluent, the ASP did not show relevant criticisms in the removal of both COD and ammonia. 3. 3rd scenario provided interesting results regarding the synergy of advanced and conventional processes. This combination demonstrated to be really effective for the treatment of liquid wastes as long as the feed water was characterised by 30% of thermophilic effluent and 70% of sewage wastewater (above this ratio, nitrifying bacteria were inhibited, despite a slight decrease of COD removal).
机译:1.第一种情况被明确确定为液体废物的异质性通常是生物处理的限制因素。我们的测试和AUR测试证明对强调抑制活性污泥非常有用。 2.第二种情况突出说明了UASB和ASP之间的协同作用是有效的。即使使用100%的UASB废水进料,ASP在去除COD和氨气方面也没有表现出相关的批评。 3.第三种情况提供了有关先进工艺与传统工艺协同作用的有趣结果。只要给水以30%的嗜热废水和70%的污水为特征,这种组合被证明对液体废物的处理是真正有效的(在此比例以上,尽管COD去除率略有降低,但硝化细菌仍受到抑制)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号